Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB, January 2002 0 • Page 2 . <br />4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING <br />Test Method Developed By: <br />F-1 Tank Manufacturer FR Industry Standard Professional Engineer <br />0 Other (Specify) <br />Test Method Used: <br />Pressure FX1 Vacuum Hydrostatic <br />Other (Specify) <br />Test Equipment Used: <br />Tank # 3 LUB Tank # <br />Equipment Resolution: <br />Tank # Tank # <br />Is Tank Exempt From Testing? 1 <br />❑ Yes 0 No <br />Yes ❑ Na <br />Yes No <br />Ycs No <br />Tank Capacity: <br />5,000 <br />Tank Material: <br />DW STEEL <br />Tank Manufacturer: <br />unknown <br />Product Stored: <br />LUBE OIL <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressure/vacuum/water and <br />starting test: <br />5min <br />Test Start Time: <br />8:30 <br />Initial Reading (RI ): <br />7hg <br />Test End Time: <br />8:35 <br />Final Reading (RF ): <br />0 <br />Test Duration: <br />5min <br />Change in Reading (RF - RI ): <br />7hg <br />PasslFail Threshold or Criteria: <br />1 . 7hg <br />Test Result: <br />El 11ISS � Fail <br />El Pass D Fail <br />� Pass <br />1. Full <br />El Paws Fail,' <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />ElYes <br />N <br />NA <br />Yes <br />N <br />NA <br />Yes <br />No[_]NA <br />Yes N <br />NA <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />verified functional after testing? <br />Ye N NA <br />0 � <br />Ye N NA <br />❑ � � <br />Ye N NA <br />❑ � � <br />Q Ye N NA <br />Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br />G Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br />containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment <br />testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) <br />