Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB,January 2002 Page k of 7- <br /> 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING <br /> Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ <br /> Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested ❑ <br /> Test Method Developed By: ❑Sump Manufacturer 64ndustry Standard ❑Professional Engineer <br /> ❑Other(Specify) <br /> Test Method Used: ❑Pressure ❑Vacuum ZHydrostatic <br /> ❑Other(Spec) <br /> Test Equipment Used: i pj co 0 Equipment Resolution: o . a o t <br /> Fill Sump# iq Fill Sump# r6 g- Fill Sump# Fill Sump# <br /> Sump Diameter: r, `6" 41? > <br /> Sump Depth: 2 28 <br /> Height from Tank Top to Top of <br /> Highest Piping Penetration: <br /> Height from Tank Top to Lowest I t 2 3 it <br /> Electrical Penetration: <br /> Condition of sump prior to O k O K O y— <br /> testin : <br /> Portion of Sump Tested o a(( 0,(( <br /> Sump Material: ewr ks 5 csLr <br /> Wait time between applying <br /> pressure/vacuum/waterand S S Y),, t <br /> starting test: <br /> Test Start Time: ! / <br /> Initial Reading(Rj): -lot 6 3O <br /> Test End Time: p o 32 /03 Z <br /> Final Reading RF): 3 S•Slob 3 65 <br /> Test Duration: / -m i <br /> Change in Reading(R,-R,): —B-000 .{'0.Otz {O 066L <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: t 6 •o 6'L _F o . a 2- `t 0,o cL <br /> Test Result: c9-Pass ❑Fail 9 Pass ❑Fail iot Pass 0 Fail ❑,Pass ❑Fail <br /> Is there a sensor in the sump? Yes ❑No A Yes ❑No M Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No <br /> Does the sensor alarm when <br /> either product or water is )&Yes ❑No ❑NA AYes ❑No (INA RlYes ❑No [INA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA <br /> detected? <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? dyes ❑No ❑NA Kyes ❑No ❑NA WYes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and <br /> verified functional after testis ? es ❑No ❑NA 9,Ycs 11No ElI NA Kes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA <br /> Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up forfailed tests) <br />