Laserfiche WebLink
FEB.25.2003 9:41RM 51-OTT CO • NO.607 P.3/11 <br /> S WRCB, January 2002 Page—of <br /> q, TESTING <br /> Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacture Industry Standard Professional Engineer <br /> Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic <br /> Otlier(Specify) <br /> E <br /> q quip <br /> Test Equipment ment Resolution: <br /> mpmentlised <br /> Y i,ip ll ° Tank# Tank#1 <br /> u! Tank# Tank# <br /> Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' Yes yes No j Yes No Yes No <br /> Tank Capacity: ��td <br /> Tank Material: 1)W rr <br /> Tank Manufacturer: <br /> Product Stored: CrA, <br /> Wait time between applying, <br /> pressure/vacuum/water and U <br /> starting test: <br /> Test Start Time: app r <br /> Initial Reading(R): <br /> Test find Time: <br /> Final Reading(RF): 1.D"LA <br /> Test Duration: h <br /> Change in Reading(RF-Rj): O <br /> pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: O <br /> TesL'Result: r Pas3' QTatl' 0 Pas .Fath ;;"p Pais'. p;.V it+' M Pges p,FatT . <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? c�V No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and es No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA <br /> verified functional after testin^? f' <br /> Comments include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendQdfollo%t up for failed tests) <br /> Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br /> containment,such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum,are exempt from periodic contaimnent <br /> testing. (California Code of Regulations,Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) <br />