My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 1996-2014
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NEWCASTLE
>
7650
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231698
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 1996-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/2/2024 4:46:37 PM
Creation date
11/5/2018 9:28:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1996-2014
RECORD_ID
PR0231698
PE
2381
FACILITY_ID
FA0003938
STREET_NUMBER
7650
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
NEWCASTLE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
18115002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
7650 S NEWCASTLE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\NEWCASTLE\7650\PR0231698\COMPLIANCE INFO 1996-2014.PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 1996-2014
QuestysRecordDate
10/3/2017 8:26:09 PM
QuestysRecordID
3660609
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 23, 1998 <br /> 96-1113008.80 <br /> State of California <br /> Department of the Youth Authority <br /> Facilities Planning Division <br /> Attention: Ms. Corinda Yep, Chief-Hazardous Materials and Waste Program <br /> Subject: LETTER-REPORT-Re-Sampling of Former Diesel Underground Storage Tank Locations <br /> Northern California Youth Correctional Center <br /> 7650 South Newcastle Road <br /> Stockton, California <br /> Page 2 <br /> had been established in the field. The MARK representative consulted with Ms. Briggs regarding her <br /> understanding of the sample identifications,and she agreed that there had apparently been some confusion <br /> as to sample identification. <br /> A summary of possible the mis-identifications in the preliminary data is as follows: <br /> ■ Samples from the Dewitt Nelson School appeared to have been reversed, west to east. <br /> However,since the total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel(TPH-d)analytical results were either <br /> none detected or very low[64 milligrams per kilogram(mg/kg)in stockpile sample SP-DW-D], <br /> no re-sampling was considered warranted; <br /> ■ Samples from the Karl Holton School also appeared to have been reversed, west to east. In this <br /> case, the TPH-d analytical results for the native soil were none detected, however, the <br /> excavation stockpile results were reported at 8,528 mg/kg(SP-CH-H)and 586 mg/kg(SP-CH- <br /> F). Given the wide difference in TPH-d levels between the two locations, and that different <br /> remedial options would probably be recommended,resampling was considered warranted; and <br /> ■ Samples from the O.H Close School appeared accurate with respect to location. However,the <br /> high TPH-d concentration(7,994 mg/kg)reported for native soil sample YA-5 was contrary to <br /> observations made in the field. The laboratory,Chemical and Environmental Laboratories,Inc., <br /> was contacted and was asked to evaluate whether the sample sleeve contained excavation <br /> backfill(yellow-ish to grayish-brown sand or grayish-brown silty clay) or native soil(reddish- <br /> brown clayey silt). The laboratory reported that the supposed native soil sample YA-5 consisted <br /> of grayish-brown sand which matches the description of excavation backfill. Given that it <br /> appears that excavation backfill was sampled and analyzed rather than native soil, re-sampling <br /> was considered warranted for the west UST location. <br /> On March 30, 1998, Allwest submitted their Underground Fuel Storage Tank Closure report to <br /> Vector 3, and then subsequently to DYA. In this report, the mapped sample locations appeared to have <br /> been adjusted to correspond to the sample identifications agreed to upon in the field. However, reported <br /> sample concentrations still appeared to be anomalous. Their report stated the findings and recommended <br /> further delineation of the extent of TPH-d impacted soil beneath the former location of tank no. 5 (i.e., west <br /> UST at O. H. Close School). Due to the apparent location and concentration anomalies, MARK <br /> recommended re-sampling of the Karl Holton School UST locations and the west UST location at the O. <br /> H. Close School. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.