My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 1996-2014
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NEWCASTLE
>
7650
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231698
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 1996-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/2/2024 4:46:37 PM
Creation date
11/5/2018 9:28:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1996-2014
RECORD_ID
PR0231698
PE
2381
FACILITY_ID
FA0003938
STREET_NUMBER
7650
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
NEWCASTLE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
18115002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
7650 S NEWCASTLE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\NEWCASTLE\7650\PR0231698\COMPLIANCE INFO 1996-2014.PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 1996-2014
QuestysRecordDate
10/3/2017 8:26:09 PM
QuestysRecordID
3660609
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 23, 1998 <br /> 96-1113008.80 <br /> State of California <br /> Department of the Youth Authority <br /> Facilities Planning Division <br /> Attention: Ms. Corinda Yep, Chief-Hazardous Materials and Waste Program <br /> Subject: LETTER-REPORT-Re-Sampling of Former Diesel Underground Storage Tank Locations <br /> Northern California Youth Correctional Center <br /> 7650 South Newcastle Road <br /> Stockton, California <br /> Page 4 <br /> ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> The soil samples were delivered by the MARK geologist to McCampbell Analytical of Pacheco, <br /> California, a state-certified laboratory. The samples were analyzed within appropriate holding times for <br /> TPH-d per EPA Test Method 8015m. The analytical results from the nineteen Advanced samples and the <br /> six primary MARK samples are summarized in Table 1. The analytical results from the re-sampling are <br /> included in Attachment C. <br /> Of the four re-samples collected from the two Karl Holton School UST locations, non-detectable <br /> TPH-d conditions were confirmed for the two native soil samples [CH-3R (10.5') and CH-4R (10')]. <br /> Similar TPH-d concentrations,470 mg/kg in CH-4R(4.5')versus 586 mg/kg in SP-CH-F, were found in <br /> the east UST stockpile (now backfill) soil samples. However, only 44 mg/kg was detected in re-sample <br /> CH-3R (45) which corresponds to Advanced stockpile/backfill sample SP-CH-H which reportedly <br /> contained 8,528 mg/kg TPH-d. <br /> Of the two re-samples collected from the O. H. Close School UST location, MARK re-samples <br /> OH-5R (10') (native soil) and OH-5R (4') (backfill/stockpile soil) contained no detectable TPH-d <br /> concentrations, while Advanced samples YA-5 (native soil) and SP-YA-I (stockpile/backfifl soil) <br /> reportedly contained 7,994 mg/kg and 2,454 mg/kg, respectively. <br /> HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS <br /> The site is underlaid by flood basin deposits consisting silty and fine sandy soils associated with <br /> the San Joaquin-Sacramento River. These deposits are estimated to be as much as 100 feet thick. <br /> Trenches excavated to depths of 10 to 14 feet bgs during the UST removal operations, and the borings <br /> advanced to 11 feet bgs during the re-sampling, exposed native soil consisting of stiff to hard, moist, and <br /> reddish-brown clayey silt/silty clay. Three borings drilled the day before the re-sampling for another UST <br /> assessment within the facility exposed silt(clayey, sandy, gravelly, and slightly organic) and sands (clayey, <br /> silty,and at depth,poorly graded and fine-to medium-grained). Copies of these boring logs are included <br /> in Attachment B. The observed soil types are consistent with the anticipated flood plain sediments. <br /> Surface water runoff is via ephemeral streams that flow westward toward the San Joaquin River <br /> located about 7 miles west of the facility. While groundwater might be expected in isolated lenses of fine- <br /> grained sand units of old stream channels, or within peat/organic-rich soils of the delta deposits, <br /> groundwater was not encountered during the previous day's assessment investigation elsewhere within the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.