Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—CALIFORNIA ENVIRONME .PROTECTION AGENCY PETE WILSON,Governor <br /> DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCE, ,CONTROL <br /> 400 P STREET.4TH FLOOR <br /> P.O.BOX 806 <br /> SACRAMENTO,CA 95812-0806 <br /> (310) 590-5523 : !• [� <br /> August 24, 1995 <br /> EPA ID: CAD095654273 <br /> RV CIRCUITS INC Forfacility locared at. <br /> MR. ARTHUR SMITH <br /> 916 S CENTER ST 916 S CENTER ST <br /> STOCKTON, CA 95206-1310 STOCKTON, CA 95206-1310 <br /> STATUS OF FACILITIES TREATING COPPER CLEANSERS AND CONDITIONERS UNDER <br /> CONDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION <br /> Dear Mr. Smith: <br /> This letter is to inform you of some recent legal changes affecting certain Conditionally Authorized <br /> (CA) facilities. Our records indicate that your facility treats spent copper cleaners and conditioners in a CA <br /> unit. As of January 1, 1995, the statutory authority that authorized treatment of this wastestream under CA <br /> expired and, technically, this wastestream is now legally subject to the requirements of the Permit by Rule tier. <br /> The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) is taking steps to rectify this situation and is advising <br /> businesses, such as yours, that you may continue to operate under the previous guidelines. <br /> Background: Assembly Bill 1772 (1992) established a special category under CA for the treatment of <br /> less than 1,000 gallons per month of spent copper cleansers and conditioners which contain up to 5,000 parts <br /> per million(ppm) of copper. This limit goes beyond the allowance for other metals treated under CA, which <br /> are limited to a concentration of 1,400 ppm. These copper limits, set forth in Health and Safety Code <br /> 25200.3(c)(11), were written to expire on January 1, 1995, unless extended by the Legislature. AB 1772 also <br /> required DTSC to conduct a study of the risk of the waste. <br /> Current Status: The study of the relative risk of the waste was not completed and the Legislature took <br /> no action to extend this category under CA by the January 1, 1995 sunset date. Therefore, technically, this <br /> waste category no longer exists under CA, and any treatment of this waste is subject to the more stringent <br /> Permit by Rule (PBR) requirements, if the concentration exceeds 1,400 ppm. <br /> DTSC has recommended to the Legislature that this waste category be continued in CA indefinitely and <br /> that the study requirements be dropped. Assembly Bill 1966 of 1995 (Figueroa) would continue this waste in <br /> CA until 1998 and extend the deadline for this study. <br /> In the meantime, in order to avoid imposing an unnecessary burden on the regulated community, DTSC <br /> will not take enforcement action against CA facilities treating copper cleansers and conditioners pursuant to the <br /> original statutory conditions nor will DTSC require amended notifications to be filed or operation of these units <br /> under PBR. DTSC is trying to avoid unnecessary filings or changes, as the Legislature is expected to approve <br /> the extension under CA for these wastes until 1998. If legislative action is not taken this year, it may be <br /> necessary to permanently handle this treatment under the PBR tier. <br /> Your Options: If you are treating these wastes, DTSC is requiring no immediate action on your part <br /> while the Legislature considers the proposed extension. However, if you feel so compelled, you do have the <br /> option to (1) revise your notification to show the copper operations as Permit by Rule units, (2) meet the <br /> 11b <br /> L� <br /> v„�wa�n.Mi.a aw« <br />