Laserfiche WebLink
the barrel was manifested off site every two weeks. One <br /> barrel was next to the turned over barrel and did not possess <br /> a hazardous waste label. Mr. Smith was asked how he could <br /> identify this barrel as product or waste. Mr. Smith stated " <br /> the red plastic protective covers had not been removed and <br /> therefore it was an unopened product" . <br /> We then proceeded to inspect the south portion of the outside <br /> shed area. It was noted that large plastic bags were around <br /> the rear area with hazardous waste labels on them. Mr. Smith <br /> indicated that this material was the copper sludge and heavy <br /> metal waste. This material was placed in the bags in a dry <br /> state. <br /> Further inspection of the southeast corner of the shed area <br /> revealed a white, five gallon bucket and a black, 25 gallon <br /> barrel stored inside the cement berm. It was noted that <br /> neither of these containers had any labels on them. The 25 <br /> gallon black container had a damaged hazardous waste label on <br /> it which had been mostly scratched off. Mr. Smith was asked <br /> what this product was. Mr. Smith replied that he did not <br /> know. No accumulation date was evident on the portion of the <br /> label still remaining. <br /> Just to the east of the cement bermed area were several large <br /> barrels with small barrels stored in them. It was noted that <br /> wood impregnated with chemicals (blue green stains) was found <br /> stored in the barrels. Mr. Smith was asked about the wood and <br /> barrels. Mr. Smith stated the barrels were to be cleaned and <br /> then cut up. Several portions of plastic barrels were evident <br /> next to this area and appeared to be cleaned. Further <br /> investigation of the barrels revealed that one of the barrels <br /> was over half filled with liquid. Dennis Fields, OEs, tested <br /> the liquid and noted that the liquid had a low PH <br /> (approximately 1) . Mr. Smith was informed of the liquid in <br /> the barrel, and the contaminated wood. Mr. Smith stated that <br /> he was well aware that the wood impregnated with heavy metals <br /> and other chemicals would have to removed as hazardous waste. <br /> One of the 55 gallon barrels had its lid cut off. This <br /> unlabeled barrel was about 2/3 full of a waste liquid which <br /> was field tested by Dennis Fields and found to have a ph of <br /> 1.0. Mr Hunt asked Mr. Smith if this material was an acid <br /> waste. Mr. Smith replied "it must be" . After this barrel was <br /> discovered and tested for ph, Mr. Smith turned to Mr. Hunt and <br /> said " I 'm in deep shit, aren't I ? " . On top of the liquid, <br /> solid wastes were floating. Mr. Smith also was informed that <br /> the floating waste in the barrel would also have to be removed <br /> under a manifest as hazardous waste. After sampling this <br /> barrel, Mr. Smith had the liquid removed to the treatment <br /> plant. It was then noted that the barrel had approximately 3 <br /> inches of sludge in the bottom. Mr. Smith was informed that <br /> this material would also have to be removed as hazardous <br /> waste. <br />