COMPLIANCE INFO_2002 - 2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

S WRC B. January 2002 0 FINAL DRAFT 6. PIPING SUMP I 0 Page 4 of 7 Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturerrj Industry Standard El Professional Engineer El Other (Specifi) Test Method Used: ❑ Fensure ❑Vacuum H:dros[atic a Ll Test Equip111011t Used ____-- - -- —-_ _ Equipment Resolution: Sump # Sump # Sump # I Sump # Sump Diameter. Sump Depth from Top of Tank: FSump Material: Ta Height Tank Top to Top of t t t, Highest Piping Penetration: I I I U // Height from Tank Top to Top of I Lowest Electrical Penetration: (`% Za t/ 20 Condition of sump prior to testing: ppb no — o0 Depth of Sump Tested' 2�'tt7�G ao Lt` ceiii(IQJI L'/ d �� Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both ❑Yes []No DNA❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes [:]No❑NA ❑Yes ❑No [—INAproduct and water)? t Turbine shutdown response time: [s system programmed for fail-safe shutdown? ❑Yes ❑No ❑tiA ❑Yes ❑No DNA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NAI ❑Yes ❑No DNA Was fail-safe verified to be operational? ❑Yes ❑No DNA ❑Yes [:]No [INA ❑yes ❑No ❑NA —]Yes ❑No DNA Krait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: /b jv%ld / Q I'iIt ;,l`+/� Test Start Time: q 1p i Initial Reading (Rt): I Test End Time: 170 I p do I o Final Reading (Rt): ' Test Duration: C nange in Reading (KF-Ri): I Pass.'Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result f•Ifass ❑Fail Pass ❑Fail ass ❑Fail ❑Pass ❑Fail Was sensor removed for testing?Mes ❑No DNA es ❑No DNA ❑Yes ❑No ❑XA I Dyes ❑No ❑NA j �': as sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? u t e' ❑No ❑tiA Yes ❑No ❑NA Et Yes ❑No ❑NAI Eyes ❑No DNA Comments— (Include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up forfailed tests) I d:: entire depth of the sump iS not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an o :-ria}. (`) is "N 0", then the entire sump should be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160)