Laserfiche WebLink
rSWRCB,January 2002 Page of4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING <br /> Method Developed By: ❑Tank Manufacturer ❑Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer <br /> ❑Other (Specify) <br /> Test Method Used: ❑Pressure ❑Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic <br /> ❑Other (Specify) <br /> Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: <br /> Tank# Tank$t Tank# Tank# <br /> Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' ❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No <br /> Tank Capacity: <br /> Tank Material: <br /> Tank Manufacturer: <br /> Product Stored: <br /> Wait time between applying <br /> pressure/vacuum/water and <br /> starting test: <br /> Test Start Time: <br /> Initial Reading <br /> Test End Time: <br /> Final Reading(RF): <br /> Test Duration: <br /> Change in Reading(RFRj): <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br /> est Result: ❑ Pass ❑Fail ❑ Pass ❑Fail ❑ Pass ❑Fail ❑ Pass ❑Fail <br /> Was sensor removedfor testing? ❑Yes 0N 0N ❑Yes ❑No DNA ❑Yes ❑No DNA oyes ❑No DNA <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No [INA ❑Yes ❑No DNA <br /> verified functional after testing? <br /> Comments— (include information on repairs made prior to testing and recommended follow up forfoiled tests) <br /> Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br /> containment,such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum,are exempt from periodic containment <br /> testing. {California Code of Regulations,Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)1 <br />