Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB,January 2002 Page J5 of <br /> 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING <br /> Test Method Developed By: 0 Tank Manufacturer Andustry Standard 0 Professional Engineer <br /> 0 Other(Specify) <br /> Test Method Used: 0 Pressure 9-Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic <br /> 0 Other(Specify) <br /> Test Equipment Used: VU= ,rwC Equipment Resolution: <br /> Tank# Tank# 2— Tank# Tank# <br /> Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' 0 Yes 9NO 0 Yes 6No 0 Yes 0 No 0 Yes 0 No <br /> Tank Capacity. <br /> Tank Material: <br /> Tank Manufacturer: ru 5 c.a ✓`usCo <br /> Product Stored: <br /> Wait time between applying <br /> pressure/vacuum/waterand �1�V1 t� �Yl1t <br /> starting test: <br /> Test Start Time: <br /> Initial Reading W: <br /> Test End Time: 3 a if <br /> Final Reading(RF): 10i m ( I C) <br /> Test Duration L,- k r <br /> Change in Reading(RF-Ri): <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br /> Pass 0 Fail tlPass ❑Fail ❑ Pass ❑Fail ❑ Pass ❑ <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? EXYes []No E7 NA @ Yes 0 No ❑NA 0 Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes 11 No ❑NA <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and <br /> verified functional after testing? �es D No 0 NA AYes 0 No ❑NA 0 Yes ElNo 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No DNA <br /> Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing and recommended follow-up orfailed tests) <br /> 1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br /> containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum,are exempt from periodic containment <br /> testing. {California Code of Regulations,Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) <br />