My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2003 - 2006
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
8606
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0232261
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2003 - 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2023 1:10:35 PM
Creation date
11/8/2018 9:54:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2003 - 2006
RECORD_ID
PR0232261
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0002590
FACILITY_NAME
THORNTON 76
STREET_NUMBER
8606
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
07242019
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
8606 THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS3\T\THORNTON\8606\PR0232261\COMPLIANCE INFO 2003 - 2006.PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2003 - 2006
QuestysRecordDate
2/27/2018 6:46:39 PM
QuestysRecordID
3808828
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
*itoring System Certification • <br />Site Address: 8606 THORNTON ROAD <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: 15.05 <br />Complete the following checklist: <br />Date of Testing/Service: 03/02/2006 <br />0 Yes <br />❑ No * <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />❑x Yes <br />No <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />Yes <br />No * <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />O Yes <br />E] No' <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not <br />interfere with their proper operation? <br />❑ Yes <br />n No' <br />X N/A <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) operational? <br />Yes <br />[:]No* <br />[:] N/A <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive <br />shut -down? (check all that apply) ❑x Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑x Yes ❑ No <br />El Yes <br />❑ NoN/A <br />El <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e.: no mechanical <br />overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s) and operating <br />properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? % <br />❑ Yes` <br />nX No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the <br />manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />Yes* <br />Ex No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (check all that apply) ❑ Product; <br />❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />Q Yes <br />El No <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set-up reports, if applicable. <br />❑x Yes <br />n No <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers' specifications? <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />Page 2 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.