My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REMOVAL_2008
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
701
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0528938
>
REMOVAL_2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2020 11:08:18 AM
Creation date
11/8/2018 9:59:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
REMOVAL
FileName_PostFix
2008
RECORD_ID
PR0528938
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0019380
FACILITY_NAME
CITY OF STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
701
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WEBER
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
701 W WEBER
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS3\W\WEBER\701\PR0528938\REMOVAL 2008.PDF
QuestysFileName
REMOVAL 2008
QuestysRecordDate
8/16/2017 3:16:22 PM
QuestysRecordID
3583161
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
648
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stockton Promenade—N. EdisonSfreet USTs& Utility Corridors • Page 15 <br /> Underground Storage Tank Removal Report June 8,2009 <br /> WKA No. 1145.01 <br /> TPHg was not established for the Promenade, TPHg was detected in seven of the eight soil <br /> samples collected from beneath the former USTs ranging from 2.5 mg/kg to 920 mg/kg. <br /> Nine soil samples were collected and analyzed from exploratory test pits and GeoProbe locations <br /> surrounding the former UST area. Six of the nine soil samples had TPHd concentrations in <br /> excess of the 500 mg/kg cleanup goal for soil, but none of the samples contained TPHmo <br /> concentrations in excess of the corresponding TPHmo cleanup goal of 500 mg/kg. TPHg was <br /> detected in eight of the nine soil samples collected surrounding the former UST area and ranged <br /> ' from 270 mg/kg to 1,600 mg/kg. Although site-specific soil cleanup goals for TPHg range <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons were not previously established for the Stockton Promenade project, the <br /> majority of detected TPHg concentrations in soil collected during this assessment were in soil <br /> samples collected to the east and south of the former UST area, away from the footprint of the <br /> former USTs. <br /> The complex distribution of petroleum hydrocarbon-affected soil in this area of the site where <br /> there has been significant land use changes over time complicates the identification and <br /> characterization of prior petroleum release sources. However, the higher presence of distribution <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbon-affected soil to the east and south of the former USTs suggests that <br /> ' historical land use activities may have resulted in prior petroleum releases. Further soil sampling <br /> and analysis conducted by WKA to the east of the N. Edison Street UST area, as part of <br /> ' Promenade underground utility line trenching, also identified similar range petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon impacted soil,which suggests other historical release sources not directly associated <br /> with the prior presence of the four former USTs. Documentation of these additional soil <br /> 1 assessment, excavation, and removal activities will be reported to the RWQCB as part of the <br /> Stockton Promenade construction project. <br /> Soil Analytical Results—Heavy Metals <br /> Soil excavated from each UST location was temporarily placed back into each excavation, after a <br /> demarcation liner was installed. Analytical results for the soil sample collected of the contents of <br /> Tank#2 and beneath the former UST identified elevated concentrations of cadmium and zinc as <br /> compared to the other soil samples analyzed for heavy metals. This finding is consistent with the <br /> galvanized coating of Tank#2. Analytical results for soil samples collected beneath Tank#1, <br /> #3, and#4 and stockpile disposal profile samples from material excavated around Tank#1 did <br /> not exceed applicable regulatory cleanup criteria. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.