Laserfiche WebLink
UST Closure Report <br /> ABF Freight System,Inc. <br /> Manteca,California Page 5 <br /> • 4.1 Sampling <br /> On March 18, 1998, Ceres Associates, of Concord, California, collected six soil samples and one <br /> groundwater sample from the excavation area after the removal of the UST. However, en route <br /> to the laboratory the labels of the soil samples were rendered indistinguishable. As such, the <br /> groundwater sample (Excavation 11')was the only sample analyzed. <br /> On March 20, 1998, North State Environmental collected six additional soil samples and one <br /> additional groundwater sample. All the soil samples but one were analyzed. The excavation <br /> samples (TI-NW-10'4" and TI-SE-10'4" #2) were collected from the side walls of the <br /> excavation at the soil groundwater interface. The sample (D1-4') was collected from the <br /> dispenser area by hand auguring 4 feet below the surface of the ground. The stockpile samples <br /> (SP1-S and SP1-N) were collected from either side of the stockpile. Soil samples were collected <br /> in a 6-inch long, 2-inch diameter brass tube. Upon retrieval of the sample tube, the tube was <br /> capped using Teflon tape and a plastic cap, appropriately labeled, and refrigerated pending <br /> shipment to the analytical laboratory. <br /> The first groundwater sample (Excavation 11') was collected from the bottom of the excavation <br /> after the removal of the UST on March 18, 1998. The second groundwater sample (Pit Water) <br /> was collected after purging 375 gallons of water from the excavation on March 20, 1998. <br /> 4.2 Sample Handling <br /> All samples were packaged with fresh ice and packing material. Ice chests used for transporting <br /> samples were waterproof and made of plastic. Samples were packed in such a way that they did <br /> not touch during shipment. Chain-of-custody forms were signed and sealed in "zip-lock" plastic <br /> bags and affixed to the top, inside lid of each ice chest. Laboratory personnel transported the ice <br /> chests to the analytical laboratory. <br /> Chain-of-custody procedures were used for tracing the possession and handling of individual <br /> samples from the time of field collection through laboratory analysis. Documentation of custody <br /> is accomplished through a chain-of-custody record that lists each sample and the names of <br /> individuals responsible for sample collection, shipment, and receipt. Copies of chain-of-custody <br /> forms are given in Appendix 4. <br /> Samples submitted to North State Environmental Lab included chain-of-custody records. The <br /> chain-of-custody records were properly signed and the date of collection and shipment recorded, <br /> along with the sample site identifications and requested analyses for each sample. The <br /> laboratory used the chain-of-custody form to document the condition of samples on arrival at the <br /> laboratory. Sample labels were affixed to all sample tubes. The sample labels marked in <br /> indelible ink with the field sample number and other required information. All labels used on the <br /> containers were of a permanent type. <br /> • <br /> NAPR07ECTS\3272\Plans and Reports\UST Closure Report.doc <br /> May 22,1998 <br />