My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SAN JOAQUIN
>
640
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518459
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2018 4:49:51 PM
Creation date
11/30/2018 4:03:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0518459
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0013913
FACILITY_NAME
HERITAGE SQUARE
STREET_NUMBER
640
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
SAN JOAQUIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13916110
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
640 N SAN JOAQUIN ST
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
No Further Action Request <br /> 640 N.San Joaquin Street,Stockton,CA <br /> October 9,2002 <br /> Page 5 <br /> It is Condor's opinion that the low concentration of motor oil range petroleum hydrocarbons detected in <br /> the groundwater sample collected from boring B-3 may be the result of trace cross-contamination of the <br /> sampling tool from the soil above. As the groundwater in B-3 entered the groundwater sampler, it is <br /> • possible that a trace of contamination on the sampler could have mobilized into the sampler and been <br /> collected. The following support this possibility: <br /> &W • The depth to groundwater at the site is greater than 30 feet bgs. <br /> • The laboratory analytical results indicate that no soil samples collected at the site from deeper <br /> than 15.5 feet bgs were impacted by hydrocarbon contamination. <br /> a The local soil types at the site are tight clays, restricting the movement of contaminants <br /> through the subsurface. <br /> 0 Heavy hydrocarbon constituents characterize the soil contamination and are prone to adhering <br /> to sampling equipment, potentially resulting in cross-contamination of water samples. <br /> Groundwater was included in the risk evaluation performed in Section 3.0 in order to provide the most <br /> conservative risk analysis. <br /> The mass of soil containing hydrocarbons was estimated using an aerial extent of 108 ft2 and a maximum <br /> thickness of six feet. The volume of hydrocarbon contaminated soil is approximated to have a lobate <br /> LW shape. Condor estimates the mass of soil containing detectable concentrations of hydrocarbons in the <br /> subsurface at the site is approximately 32,332 pounds. The geometric mean concentration of 8,536.5 <br /> mg/kg of hydrocarbons remaining in the soil was calculated using the analytical results of four Soil <br /> samples collected from the volume of contaminated soil. Calculations indicate the total mass of <br /> hydrocarbons remaining in the soil at the site is approximately 608 pounds. A calculation worksheet is <br /> presented in Appendix B. <br /> 5.0 SENSITIVE RECEPTOR SURVEY <br /> Condor conducted a sensitive receptor survey within a 2,000-foot radius of the site(study area) to identify <br /> L" potential areas of groundwater recharge or discharge (surface water bodies), schools, and potential water <br /> well users that could be impacted by migration of groundwater from the site. The sensitive receptor <br /> survey consisted of inquiries to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Central District in <br /> Sacramento, California, contacting public water purveyors, visually inspecting the area within 500 feet of <br /> the site, and interviewing residents located in the site vicinity. DWR well records were cross-referenced <br /> with Assessor's Parcel Maps and city street maps. This process helped identify well records pertaining to <br /> Lo wells estimated to be within the study area. DWR well records may include the well owner's name, a well <br /> location map, the address where the well is located, and a log of the well. <br /> Lo 5.1 DWR RECORDS WITHIN 2,000 FEET <br /> Documents provided by the DWR, associated with Section 2, Township 1 North, and Range 6 East, <br /> include information pertaining to 19 water wells. The DWR records were reviewed based on Assessor's <br /> V Parcel Maps, area reconnaissance, a topographic quadrangle map, and a city street map. Thirteen of the <br /> well records pertain to wells located outside of the study area. Six well records pertain to rive wells that <br /> were verified to be within the study area. The information provided by the DWR indicated that two of the <br /> i.. five wells located within the study area had been destroyed. <br /> ' According to DWR records correlated with Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) and mapping information, <br /> l,r six well records pertain to five wells located with the study area. <br /> L <br /> A <br /> f i� CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.