Laserfiche WebLink
page 2, 1207 Aurora Street <br /> The Quarterly Monitoring Report documented the results of the quarterly groundwater monitoring <br /> and sampling event that took place on June 14, 2001. Analytical results were consistent with <br /> historical trends in wells MWA through MW-8. Results from the new wells indicate that the lateral <br /> extent of the shallow contaminant plume has been fairly well defined, but that the vertical extent of <br /> the plume and the lateral extent at depth have not been completely defined. <br /> The bulk of the soil contamination remaining at this site is located in the areas of the former UST's <br /> to a depth of about 65-feet bsg. PHS/EHD agrees that the lateral extent of the shallow <br /> contaminant plume has been fairly well defined. The vertical extent of the plume may not be <br /> completely defined. The contaminant levels in the well screened at 130-feet bsg are similar to <br /> those in the wells screened at 110-feet bsg. Continued quarterly sampling will determine if further <br /> definition of the vertical extent of the plume will be required. <br /> PHSIEHD directs you to conduct a feasibility study to evaluate alternatives for remediation of the <br /> documented contamination at this site. The study must evaluate a minimum of two alternatives for <br /> their cost effectiveness and their ability to mitigate the contamination. The feasibility study must be <br /> completed prior to preparation of a Corrective Action Plan for the site. A work plan for feasibility <br /> testing is due to PHSIEHD by January 21, 2002. <br /> On November 20, 2001 a meeting was held at the PHSIEHD office to discuss with you the chronic <br /> problems you have with meeting regulatory deadlines. This meeting was scheduled after repeated <br /> requests by PHSIEHD for the above referenced reports to be submitted. As the responsible party <br /> you were expected to attend the meeting, but did not do so. Present at the meeting were Mr. <br /> Pieter Crosby, of PC Toxics, and Ms. Margaret Lagorio and Ms. Lori Duncan of PHSIEHD. in a <br /> phone conversation later that day it was discussed with you that as the responsible party you are <br /> the person responsible for the timely completion of work and submittal of reports, not your <br /> consultant, and that you are the one who will bear the consequences if your eligibility to the Clean- <br /> up Fund is lost because of non-compliance with regulatory directives. As has been stated to you <br /> previously, failure to submit another report within 60-days following the completion of any site <br /> fieldwork, or to submit a requested work plan by the due date will result in the referral of this site to <br /> the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, for enforcement action. <br /> If you have any questions or comments please call Lori Duncan at(209)468-0337. <br /> Donna Heran, REHS, Director <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> (CIA Q <br /> Lori Duncan, Senior REHS Margaret La orlo, Supervising REHS <br /> LOP/Site Mitigation Unit IV LOP/Site Mitigation Unit IV <br /> cc: Marty Hartzell, CVRWQCB <br /> Mark Jerpbak, JJW Geosciences <br />