Laserfiche WebLink
V r � <br /> �. Groundwater extraction is typically a suitable remedial method to employ as a <br /> "polishing" effort following completion of more rigorous remedial methods. Given <br /> that the focus of remediation will be on the groundwater, this treatment option is <br /> proposed to be evaluated for possible later implementation. <br /> 3.1.2 In-Situ Treatment Options <br /> Air Spa rging <br /> This treatment option involves the introduction of air below the water table to <br /> ` volatilize hydrocarbon vapors and to stimulate natural biodegradation due to the <br /> added oxygen. Air is introduced to the subsurface through an injection well(s) <br /> installed at a strategic location. The well is outfitted with a bubble diffuser which <br /> allows the generation of minuscule air bubbles, thus extending the residence time <br /> that the air remains in contact with the contaminants_ The concentration gradient <br /> between the contaminant-laden water and the air results in partitioning of the <br /> �- contaminants into the air bubbles. The air bubbles then migrate upward through <br /> the formation, where they can be collected and extracted using vapor extraction <br /> technology as an option depending on groundwater depth, lithology, and site <br /> r.. conditions. <br /> Biodegradation Augmentation <br /> As mentioned previously, given sufficient time, the contamination would degrade <br /> in the presence of adequate biotic stimuli. However, this process would typically <br /> take many years. Biodegradation rates can be greatly accelerated by <br /> augmentation of the factors which tend to limit degradation rates. <br /> The most common rate-limiting factor is the limited availability of oxygen. <br /> Introduction of supplemental oxygen into the subsurface, such as with bioventing <br /> and air sparging, oftentimes is sufficient to stimulate an increase in <br /> biodegradation. Additionally, more potent oxygen concentrations can be <br /> introduced by means of oxidizing compounds. One such common method is the <br /> F use of Oxygen Release Compound (ORC(D). ORCO introduces high <br /> concentrations of oxygen into the formation at a steady rate. <br /> Lo <br /> There are no empirical pilot tests to evaluate the effectiveness of biodegradation <br /> augmentation. Typically, effectiveness is determined via actual field testing <br /> �- performed over a period of approximately three to six months. However, the <br /> success of ORCO has been fairly well demonstrated at a number of sites such <br /> that it would be safe to assume it to be effective for this site, if it can be <br /> �. appropriately fine-tuned to site conditions. <br /> Ozone Injection <br /> y <br /> Ozone injection technology incorporates the use of injected ozone to enhance <br /> subsurface contaminant oxidation (degradation). This technology is similar to <br /> L. biodegradation augmentation, except that contaminant degradation occurs <br /> through chemical, rather than biotic, oxidation processes. Studies suggest high <br /> success rates and fairly rapid contaminant degradation. Further, once installed, <br /> w <br /> 4 JJW GEOSCIENCES Inc. <br />