Laserfiche WebLink
' Geo(ogica[Technics Inc. i Page 3 <br /> Soil Boring Installation Work Plan <br /> Fortifiber <br /> ' Project No. 709.2 <br /> December 7, 1998 <br /> ' 1. Paint (Ink) Shed — Located on the south end of the truck-loading ramp. The shed was <br /> anchored to the concrete slab. Deteriorated concrete was scrapped off, the rest of the slab <br /> was cleaned and then it was resurfaced. No soil samples were collected and tested from <br /> ' under the deteriorated area. <br /> 2. Tank Farm — It is not clear, but observations suggest that only the west ASTs secondary <br /> containment unit had the stained soil removed and disposed of as hazardous waste. Odor <br /> ' and visual observations were used to confirm the soil cleanup; no confirmation soil <br /> samples were taken. The ground surface was then covered with pea gravel. <br /> 3. Trash Compactor — (Area just west of the Waste Paper Bailers.) The stained asphalt and <br /> clay soil was removed and disposed of as hazardous waste. Soil cleanup inspection was <br /> performed by visual and odor observations; no confirmation soil samples were tested. <br /> The ground surface was covered with pea gravel. <br /> 4. Storage/Machinery Cleaning Area — Upon removal of the drums and other stored <br /> t materials, the stained soil was scrapped in a similar manner as at the three above <br /> locations. It was discovered, however, that the stained soil extended deeper. Additional <br /> soil was excavated to the depth of the groundwater interface (-12 feet). This <br /> ' contaminated material was disposed of as hazardous waste. Soil cleanup inspection was <br /> performed by visual and odor observations; no confirmation soil or groundwater samples <br /> were tested. The ground surface was covered with pea gravel. <br /> Conclusions <br /> ' • Even though the visible contaminated soil was removed, several types of chemicals that <br /> could be present do not leave an obvious stain, especially in the dark brown clay soils of <br /> Tracy. These chemicals could still be present in the soils of this Property. <br /> ' Recommendations <br /> • Soil samples should be tested in all four areas below the depth of soil removal by <br /> Universal. <br /> ' • A groundwater sample should be tested in the area of storage/machinery cleaning area. <br /> • These samples should be tested for petroleum products and hazardous chemicals <br /> (including solvents, volatile organic compounds, and metals). <br /> ' Figure 1 is a vicinity map and Figure 2 shows the locations of the concerns discussed above. <br /> Work Plan Submittal <br /> t Geological Technics Inc. (GTI) was contracted by Rehrig Pacific Co. to prepare the <br /> following work plan, obtain a boring permit and investigate these areas of concern. A boring <br /> permit application is attached. <br /> ' 2.0 PROPOSED INVESTIGATION <br /> It is proposed that a total of 12 soil borings be installed. Samples will be collected <br /> continuously for geological and chemical analytical evaluation as discussed below. Hand <br /> auger equipment will be decontaminated with an Alconox solution between boreholes. <br /> ' 2.1 Soil Boring Installation i <br /> The work proposed here addresses the potential environmental issues on this Property as <br /> ' identified above. The work is outlined as follows. The soil collection protocol is discussed <br /> in Section 2.2. <br /> 1 <br />