Laserfiche WebLink
P4 'Vag <br /> _ sITh . <br /> s <br /> c <br /> i <br /> i <br /> ggl <br /> MEMO- <br /> i <br /> VMSSSSOWTF.S <br /> Jack Ficri 6 <br /> 27 May 1987 <br /> " 'These four phases revealed that hydrocarbon concentrations were <br /> E <br /> increasing with depth below the 1,000-gallon gasoline tank. Soil sample L-2, <br /> 3 ft below the bottom of the tank, contained 750 ppm TFHC. Soil sample L-3, <br /> 2.5 ft below L-2, contained 1,000 ppm TFHC. Soil samples SJMB2/A, 22 ft below <br /> L-2, and BH31, 6 ft below SJMB2/A, contained 3,800 ppm and 3,300 ppm TFHC, <br /> respectively. There was no evidence of a leak in the gasoline tank or the <br /> 130 <br /> piping, or in any of the other tanks or piping. Soil boring L-1 contained <br /> ppm TFHC 2 ft below the 8,000-gallon weed oil tank, but SJMB1/A, approximately <br /> 133.1 ft below L-1, was below detection. <br /> _f the San nuin Local Heal'zh District <br /> To meet the requircmeftts -_._ 3_a-. <br /> (SJLHD), three ground water monitoring <br /> wells were installed to determine <br /> ^' ground water flow direction ar_d gradient and to determine if hydrocarbons were <br /> �- present in ground water beneath the site. The work per <br /> for this phase <br /> of the project is described below. <br /> WELL INSTALLATION AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS <br /> Wells MW-1, F4W-2 and MW-3 were installed on 17, 18 and 19 December 1986 <br /> respectively, by Joseph Theiscn, WA geologist, using 10.5-in. OD, 6-in ID <br /> hollow-stem augers operated by !.H. Kleinfelder and Associates' Drilling <br /> Division, Stockton, California. Well locations were selected based on tank <br /> W locations, estimated ground water flow direction and site access. Monitoring <br /> well locations are shown in Figure 2. Borehole stratigraphy and well <br /> a n the boring logs in Attachment A. <br /> completion details are shown o <br /> s <br /> The boreholes were logged from cuttings and drive samples. The drive <br /> stratigraphy and relative permeability were <br /> samples used . to document soil <br /> collected in an unlined 2.0-in. ID California modified drive sampler. Soil <br /> samples for chemical analysis were collected in a brass tuolasticlined cease <br /> ~ -sampler. The samples were capped with aluminum foil and p p <br /> hermetically sealed with duct tape, labeled, refrigerated and transported <br /> atories <br /> under chain-of-custody fora:_ :o,-row and Caldwell Analytic labor <br /> of Emeryville, California. The augers and drive steam-cleaned d <br /> sampler were <br /> r. <br />