My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012549
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BECKMAN
>
200
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544106
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012549
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2019 9:57:26 AM
Creation date
2/6/2019 9:51:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012549
RECORD_ID
PR0544106
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0015207
FACILITY_NAME
SJC MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL DIST
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
BECKMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04905031
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
200 N BECKMAN RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jack Fiori we►ss ASSWIATEs <br /> 27 May 1987 8 <br /> prior to drilling each new boring and the drive sampler was washed between <br /> samples. <br /> - During the drilling of MW-1 soil samples from 10 ft, 15 ft, 27.5 ft, 31.0 <br /> ft and 40.5 ft were analyzed in the field using a portable Organic Vapor <br /> - Analyzer (OVA) to determine if volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were <br /> present. The OVA readings were below the meter's detection limit of 0.2 ppm. <br /> Soil samples from wells MW-2 and MW-3 were not analyzed by the OVA since <br /> neither the drive samples nor the cuttings emitted any observable odors. <br /> Chemical analysis of a soil sample collected from 41.3 ft in MW-2 yielded <br /> results below detection. Table 2 lists all results for field and laboratory <br /> analysis for this phase of work. <br /> -- Boreholes MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 were drilled in alluvial deposits <br /> consisting of silty sands and clean sands of moderate to high estimated <br /> permeability with interbedded clays and s!lts of low estimated permeability. <br /> Minor lithologic variations occurred in each boring, but the lithology appears <br /> to be correlative across the site. Ground wator was encountered at <br /> approximately 40 ft below the ground surface during drilling and four-inch <br /> diameter monitoring wells were constructed in the three boreholes on 17, 18 <br /> and 19 December. The wells were screened in the moderate to high permeability <br /> sediments. The top of the screened interval was placed 10 ft above ,first <br /> water at the request of SJLHD to allow for seasonal fluctuations. <br /> WELL DEVELOPMENT <br /> r , <br /> ,M Wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 were developed on 30 January 1987 using an <br /> airlift system. Approximately 425 gallons were evacuated and discharged into <br /> a 20-yard plastic-lined dumpster for temporary storage. The flow rate for <br /> MW-1 using airlift techniques is approximately 2.5 gallons per minute (gpm). <br /> ►.. Wells MW-2 and MW-3 were developed using a surge block, water injection and a <br /> submersible pump as well as an airlift system. The estimated flow rates for <br /> wells MW-2 and MW-3 are .3 gpm and .25 gpm, respectively. The actual flow., <br /> rates calculated during development are much lower than expected for thz <br /> formation materials. Auger drilling may have smeared some of the formations <br /> ti <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.