Laserfiche WebLink
Report of Results <br /> investigation of Agricultural Chemicals in Soil <br /> PureGro/Brea Facility <br /> 1905 North Broadway Ave.,Stockton,CA <br /> Sierra-Pacific Project No.94-055.08 <br /> Impact samples were collected and analyzed as described above, in accordance with the procedures in <br /> the approved work plan. Chain-of-custody forms were completed, and the soil samples were transported <br /> in an iced-cooler to Sequoia Analytical Laboratories, Inc,, located in Sacramento, within 24 hours of <br /> collection. <br /> 4.6 Abandonment of Soil Borin s Wa to and Rinsate Stgrauge and L)igposal <br /> Upon completion of the soil boring program,each of the open soil borings was tremmie-grouted to the <br /> surface with a bentonite-cement slurry in accordance with State and county-decommissioning policies. <br /> Soil cuttings were placed in 55-gallon Department of Transportation(DOT)-approved drums that are <br /> labeled, dated, and staged at the Broadway Avenue site for disposal. Augers and sampling equipment <br /> were cleaned at the site after use. Rinsates from equipment decontamination were also placed in 55- <br /> gallon DOT drums and staged at the site pending analysis and disposal. <br /> 4.7 Laboratory Analysis of Samples <br /> All samples collected were analyzed for NO;-N by EPA method 300.0, and for TKN by EPA method <br /> 351.4. Additionally, samples from borings NSB-1,NSB-2, NSB-3, and NSB-4 were also analyzed for <br /> halogenated volatile organic compounds by EPA method 8010. The results of the NO;-N and TKII <br /> analyses are presented in tabular form in Table 1 herein. Values for total nitrogen are also presented in <br /> Table 1 and on Figure 3. <br /> To provide accurate site specific data on the physical properties of the on-site soils for future use in a <br /> risk assessment for this site, three soil samples (NSB-2-20,NSB-5-5, and NSB-6-20) were submitted <br /> to Unocal's contract laboratory, PTS Laboratories, Inc. of Santa Fe Springs, California, for physical <br /> testing. The samples chosen represented the range of soil types encountered during this investigation. <br /> The samples were tested for moisture content by ASTM method D2216, for porosity by API method <br /> RP40, for bulk density by ASTM method 2937, for soil pH by EPA method 9045, for grain size by <br /> ASTM method D4464M, for total organic carbon by the Walkley-Black method, and for permeability <br /> (reported as native state effective permeability to water and native state effective water conductivity) by <br /> ASTM method D5084. <br /> t <br /> i <br /> Sierra-Pacific Groundwater Consultants, Inc. 10 <br />