Laserfiche WebLink
d <br /> 02/22/00 Meeting at EHD office to discuss work plan status. Present at the <br /> meeting were Margaret Lagorio and Carol Oz, EHD; Robert Lease, <br /> f Responsible Party; Robert Marty,AGE consultant. A work plan to <br /> continue the site investigation was submitted this date that also included a <br /> summary of the work performed <br />{ <br /> and data collected on 2/1/99. <br /> 02/23/00 Work plan was approved by EHD. <br /> 03/07/00 Field work conducted this date. Two soil borings completed; soil ! <br /> samples and one grab groundwater sample were collected. <br /> j 05/23/00 Faxed analytical results from 03/07/00 fiel Id work'received by EHD. Both <br /> I soil and water samples were non-detect for all constituents analyzed. I <br /> 04/18/00 Record Title Owner letters sent this date to bothresponsible parties. 1 <br /> k <br /> 08/28/00 Date of Preliminary Investigation and Evaluation I�Report on work <br /> performed 3/7/00. Report recommends once additional boring be <br /> completed south of the dispenser island area. ' <br /> i <br /> 09/14/00 EHD directive to submit a work plan sent this date to the responsible <br /> parties. ! i <br /> 11/13/00 Work plan for continued investigation received by, EHD this date. <br /> 11/23/00 EHD approved the work plan in a letter this;date„,but the work was <br /> not completed. { <br /> 09/19/03 NOR sent this date to new property owner,'Jacob & Sali P. John, sister <br /> of Thomas Chacko. <br /> 11/02/05 Date of SWRCB-CUF letter; notice of sites'leligibi!lity to the clean up fund <br /> priority class B, Claim #018322. <br /> 11/08/05 Date of Closure Summary Report. Report concludes that approximately 1 <br /> gallon of gasoline remains in the soil at the,'site; there was no detected f <br /> contamination in the groundwater; the closest potential receptor is a <br /> municipal well located 1,700 feet southeastiof thesite. The report <br /> recommends that the site be considered for closure. <br /> 'I <br /> f <br /> i <br />