My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CAMBRIDGE
>
16470
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544155
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2019 2:31:10 PM
Creation date
2/15/2019 1:45:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0544155
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0000185
FACILITY_NAME
CITY GAS & LIQUOR
STREET_NUMBER
16470
STREET_NAME
CAMBRIDGE
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19643032
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
16470 CAMBRIDGE ST
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 2 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Margaret Lagorio [EH] <br /> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 11:03 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 16470 Cambridge <br /> I think we need to discuss this at the unit meeting Wednesday, along with RB guidance document etc. <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 10:48 AM <br /> To: Margaret Lagorio [EH] <br /> Subject: 16470 Cambridge <br /> Margaret, <br /> remember that email you sent Munch on July 7? This regarding a comment <br /> draft letter I sent to you for review. <br /> As you noted on my draft comment letter for this site's BST Evaluation and <br /> recommendation to implement a full ozone and SVE system, I've asked Nuel <br /> for his input. Now I have Munch's concerns added to Nuels concerns and the <br /> question originally asked about WDRs has still NOT been answered or <br /> addressed. <br /> I feel like I need to comment on ConocoPhillips BST report's <br /> conclusion/recommendation to implement the full CAP for 03 and SVE and I <br /> was planning on adding EVERYONES concerns into it. but first, should I ask <br /> Munch about WDRs? do you want to? do we need to? and should I wait for <br /> his answer and then add HIS comments into our letter? or just incorporate all <br /> the extras Munch and Nuel want into a comment letter now and add a WDR <br /> statement in it and then cc Munch? <br /> or do you wanna just wait and bring this up at the Wednesday meeting and <br /> bring JLB into it too ? <br /> I have Nuels pages of comments if you'd like to see them. <br /> Michael J. Infurna Jr. <br /> Senior REHS. CA Reg #5649 <br /> LOP/Site Mitigation Unit IV <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental <br /> Health Department (SJCEHD) <br /> 600 E. Main Street <br /> Stockton, CA. 95202-3029 <br /> office: (209)468-3454 <br /> pager: (209) 982-8771 <br /> 7/14/2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.