Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: James Munch Dmunch@waterboards.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 8:26 AM <br /> To: Margaret Lagorio [EH] <br /> Cc: Mike Infurna [EH], Jim Barton <br /> Subject: RE: Last weeks e-mail. ? <br /> Margaret, <br /> Below is the body of my last week e-mail. <br /> Jim <br /> Margaret, <br /> Based upon my rather quick review of a couple of their documents (9/07 and 6/08 <br /> docs, and the 6/08 doc simply states that the bench-scale test was a success and that <br /> they propose to install what the 9/07 doc recommended)., I have the following <br /> concerns/comments: <br /> 1 . Groundwater is relatively shallow and there appears to be multiple single family <br /> and possibly some higher density (apartment type) dwellings nearby. I saw nothing in <br /> the documents I looked at that indicated any monitoring/tracking/control of possible <br /> vapor migration and mobilization problems into basements/underground utilities/etc. <br /> 2. There are insufficient monitoring locations (MWs) surrounding the proposed <br /> remedial regime to adequately monitor or track any generation of problem <br /> constituents. In addition, the wells existing are too distant and widely spaced to <br /> properly track any problems. <br /> 3. Their section on system operation, monitoring, and reporting is very basic and <br /> woefully inadequate. <br /> 4. 1 found no contingency plan if any adverse impacts are identified. <br /> Based on the above, unless there is other submitted information that details my <br /> concerns that I have not reviewed, this office would not approve the project to <br /> proceed. <br /> Jim <br /> 9916) 464-4618 <br /> >>> "Margaret Lagorio [EH]" <MLagorio@sjcehd.com> 7/7/2008 8:15 AM >>> <br /> Jim, <br /> I didn't receive an E-mail from you last week. Please resend. Thanks. <br />