My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000683
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CAPITOL
>
6421
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522496
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000683
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2019 9:05:27 PM
Creation date
2/15/2019 3:59:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0000683
RECORD_ID
PR0522496
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015317
FACILITY_NAME
FLAG CITY CHEVRON
STREET_NUMBER
6421
STREET_NAME
CAPITOL
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LODI
Zip
95245
APN
05532024
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
6421 CAPITOL AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' Mr Richard Boiddes - 2 - 6 November 2000 <br /> Mr Nick Dmgsa <br /> 1 <br /> • 1,2-DCA, tertbutyl alcohol, ethanol and methanol were detected at lesse<concentrations. The MTBE <br />' groundwater contarnination is posing a potential threat to several neighboring domestic wells. <br /> The remediation contractor willimplement a groundwater pump-and-treat system at the site utilizing 8 <br />' groundwater extraction wells Groundwater from the eight wells will be extracted at a cumulative rate of <br /> approxmiately 25 gallons per minute or a total of 36,000 gallons per day The extracted water will be <br /> passed through a series of activated carbon and treated media filters to remove the petroleum <br />' constituents The treatment system will meet the effluent limitations listed m Section C of Order No <br /> 5-00-119 (enclosed). Treated water will be discharged via a buried 2-Foch PVC pipe into the private <br />' agricultural tail water return Coldam Ditch which is located roughly 450 feet south of the site and' <br /> treatment system <br />' NITRATES <br />' Elevated nitrate levels are common within the shallow groundwater in the general site vicinity An <br /> initial groundwater sample collected from beneath the site was screened for a variety of contaminants in <br /> addition petroleum contamination Nitrate was reported at 46 mg/I as NO3, whichjust exceeds the <br />' state's drinking water maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 45 me nitrate as INO3. The project <br /> environmental contractor indicates that the graiaular actvated carbon will most likely not remove the <br /> nitrate.from the effluent There are no promulgated acute or chrome freshwater aquatic life criteria for <br /> nitrate. <br /> Coldani Ditch is a pnvate agricultural ditch, which flows to Upland Canal Uplana canal is an additional <br /> agncultural supply and drainage ditch with sigmficant dilution compared to that of Coldam Ditch There <br /> are presently no municipal or private drinking water intakes located on either water body Significant <br /> nitrate dilution would also be attained at White Slough and additionally, there are no domestic uses of <br />' White Slough in the immediate vicinity of the confluence of Upland Canal's with White slough. <br /> The Discharger is being asked to additionally monitor for nitrates in the eluent and receiving water on a <br /> monthly basis. If intrate concentrations are observed to appreciably increase or a detrimental impact to <br /> receiving waters is observed (i a increased bio-stimulation), this Order will be revoked and the <br /> Discharger will be required to pursue an individual National Pollution Discharge Elimination System <br /> (NPD ES)pert for the project that may include a requirement for nitrate treatment, <br /> PUBLIC NOTMCATION <br /> I Pursuant to Section D of Attachment A of the General Order 5-00-1.19, the consultant for the Discharger <br /> published and sent a pubhc notification letter to all recorded landowners within a 500-foot radius of the <br /> site and proposed discharge location The letter was dated 9 October 2000 and requested written or <br />' verbal response within 14 days of the date of the letter To date, neither Board staff nor the Discharger's <br /> consultant has received a response. Certif ed mail receipts were received for 8 of the 9 owners who were <br /> contacted. Board staff has made several unsuccessful attempts at contacting the remammg landowner <br /> A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.