My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS AND WORK PLANS 1987
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAGNER
>
200
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009002
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS AND WORK PLANS 1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2019 5:04:55 PM
Creation date
2/22/2019 2:32:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
FileName_PostFix
AND WORK PLANS 1987
RECORD_ID
PR0009002
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004040
FACILITY_NAME
SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAGNER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
14331007
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
200 N WAGNER AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
295
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT RAP CHECKLIST <br /> Site Name: Date of Draft RAP: <br /> Reviewer' s Name: Review Date: <br /> Policy Issues <br /> Yes No <br /> o Will the proposed remedial alternative <br /> result in a permanent solution to the <br /> contamination problem (e.g. total <br /> removal) ? <br /> o If a temporary remedy is proposed, is <br /> an ultimate long-term solution provided? <br /> o If a temporary remedy is proposed, does <br /> it include long-term financial assurance <br /> and/or deed restrictions? <br /> o Does the proposed alternative result in <br /> a net benefit to public health and the <br /> environment? <br /> o If the proposed alternative transfers the <br /> contamination problem to another location, <br /> other than to a permitted hazardous <br /> waste disposal facility, are appropriate <br /> mitigation measures discussed? <br /> o Does the draft RAP include a nonbinding <br /> preliminary allocation of respohsiblity <br /> among all identifiable potential <br /> responsible parties? <br /> o If the proposed alternative potentially <br /> requires a RCRA TSD permit or regulatory <br /> approval by other agencies, does the <br /> draft RAP discuss these issues? <br /> o Does the draft RAP summarize the community <br /> relations plan, or other community <br /> involvement? <br /> o Is the draft RAP a complete, stand-alone <br /> document which reflects Department <br /> policies? <br /> o If the draft RAP proposes to leave <br /> contaminated soil or ground water in place, <br /> has a deed restriction been proposed? <br /> Has mitigation been proposed for concentra- <br /> tions which may pose future public health <br /> or environmental concern? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.