Laserfiche WebLink
Technical Issues <br /> Yes No <br /> 0 Does the draft RAP include a discussion <br /> of health and safety risks posed by <br /> site conditions? <br /> o Does the draft RAP discuss the impact of <br /> contamination on present, future, and <br /> probable beneficial uses of contaminated, <br /> polluted, or threatened resources? <br /> o Do the alternatives evaluated consider the <br /> present, future, and probable beneficial <br /> uses of ground water supilies? <br /> o Does the draft RAP propose practical and <br /> cost-effective treatment technologies , <br /> rather than excavation and offsite disposal <br /> of contaminated material? <br /> 0 Does the draft RAP discuss the potential <br /> for offsite migration of contaminants? <br /> o Does the draft RAP summarize site-specific <br /> characteristics such as subsurface <br /> conditions and hydrogeology? <br /> o Does the draft RAP contain a reasonably <br /> detailed cost analysis of each proposed <br /> alternative, including both short-term <br /> and longer-term costs (e.g. 0 & M or <br /> treatment costs) ? <br /> o Does the draft RAP identify sensitive <br /> environmental receptors which may be <br /> affected by the proposed alternative- <br /> including rare, threatened, or endangered <br /> flora and fauna as identified by FWS and <br /> CDFG? <br /> o Does the proposed alternative avoid <br /> impacts to significant cultural <br /> resources (e.g. , archeological resources) ? <br /> o Does the draft RAP consider alternatives <br /> in addition to land disposal and/or <br /> in-situ capping or encapsulation? <br />