Laserfiche WebLink
Greg K. Vaughn • -2- 1 May 1987 <br /> treatment plant capacity) instead of 1. 31 mgd until completion of <br /> the second stage of the plant. At that time MCTC may apply for a <br /> revision their permit to accommodate the increase in their treatment <br /> plant capacity. The average flow value should also be revised to <br /> reflect the first stage treatment plant capacity. <br /> The other proposed revisions are acceptable and will be incorporated <br /> into the revised permit. <br /> Revision 3A. <br /> The water quality control plan (Basin Plan) for our region requires <br /> that waters designated for use as a domestic or municipal water <br /> supply not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess <br /> of the limits specified in the California Administrative Code, Title <br /> 22 , Article 4 , Section 64435. Title 22 provides a standard of 0. 05 <br /> mg/l for total chromium but does not provide standards for other <br /> forms of chromium (ie. CrVI or Cr III) . Therefore, the existing <br /> discharge specification (0 . 05 mg/1) for total chromium will remain <br /> in the revised permit until the Basin Plan or Title 22 is amended. <br /> Revision 3B. <br /> The inland surface water quality objectives established in the Basin <br /> Plan, state that the "pH shall not be depressed below 6 . 5 nor raised <br /> above 8 . 511 . Therefore, the existing pH limits will remain the same <br /> for the revised permit until the Basin Plan is amended. <br /> Revision 3C. <br /> See comment for Revision 2 . <br /> Revision 4 . <br /> In order to define the Calaveras River rather than the Stockton <br /> Diverting Canal (SDC) as the receiving water body for your discharge <br /> several Technical issues need to be considered. First, is your <br /> discharge toxic? To determine whether your discharge is toxic, we <br /> will be requiring that you perform biotoxicity tests in accordance <br /> with the procedures contained in the "Technical Support Document for <br /> Water Quality Based Toxics Control" , EPA Document 440/4-85-032 . I£ <br /> the tests confirm that your discharge is toxic, then the second <br /> issue that should be considered is whether the beneficial uses for <br /> the SDC should be protected. This issue must be resolved due to the <br /> fact that during low flow or dry periods the discharge will receive <br /> little or no dilution before entering the SDC and eventually the <br /> Calaveras River. The primary constituent of concern is copper <br /> because it is toxic to aquatic organisms at relatively low <br /> concentrations. Finally, we recognize that the Stockton Diverting <br /> Canal (SDC) is dry certain times of the year. <br />