Laserfiche WebLink
II. WQCB Comments: <br /> Note: The following WQCB comments have been excerpted from <br /> Attachment A to DIIS letter of April 29, 1988. Only those <br /> comments which have not been addressed in DHS comments have been <br /> repeated. <br /> WQCB Comment: <br /> 3. I [G.A. Reents of WQCB) still have the same concern <br /> regarding separation of proposed monitoring well screen <br /> intervals discussed in our 25 November 1987 comments. 1t is <br /> important to sample separate aquifer zones to obtain the <br /> most meaningful results. Also, as discussed in our 25 <br /> November, 1987 comments, not installing a shallow zone well <br /> in the initial cluster leaves a data gap. I will agree, <br /> however, that the necessity of a shallow zone well can be <br /> decided after the initial data has been collected. <br /> MCTC Response: <br /> As discussed in response to DHS comments, MCTC will comply with <br /> these suggestions. <br /> WQCB Comment: <br /> 4. It is assumed , since it is not stated , that all wells will <br /> be developed by air stripping as in the past. <br /> MCTC Response: <br /> Work Plan will be revised to note development by air lifting. <br /> WQCB Comment: <br /> 6. Storm water samples need to be collected as composites or <br /> series grabs as discussed in our 2 October 1987 comments. <br /> MCTC Response: <br /> The referenced comments were not incorporated in the sampling <br /> completed. Grab samples only were obtained. <br /> 11654 9 <br />