My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS AND WORK PLANS 2004-2014
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAGNER
>
200
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009002
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS AND WORK PLANS 2004-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2019 7:04:53 PM
Creation date
2/22/2019 3:01:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
FileName_PostFix
AND WORK PLANS 2004-2014
RECORD_ID
PR0009002
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004040
FACILITY_NAME
SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAGNER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
14331007
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
200 N WAGNER AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appendix C:Initial Study Checklist Former Marley Cooling Tower Company,Stockton,CA <br /> Impact Analysis: There are no plans to expand existing facilities. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Impact <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated <br /> ❑ Less Than Significant Impact <br /> ® No impact <br /> d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or <br /> expanded entitlements needed. <br /> Impact Analysis:There should be sufficient water supplies from city service. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Impact <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated <br /> Less Than Significant Impact <br /> ❑ No Impact <br /> a. Result in determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has <br /> adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments. <br /> Impact Analysis: No impact. Activities will not change the current process at the site. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Impact <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated <br /> ® Less Than Significant Impact <br /> ❑ No Impact <br /> f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs. <br /> Impact Analysis:There will not be a significant amount of solid waste generated during the proposed field activities. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Impact <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated <br /> ® Less Than Significant Impact <br /> ❑ No Impact <br /> g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. <br /> Impact Analysis: All Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste will be followed. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Impact <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated <br /> ❑ Less Than Significant Impact <br /> ® No Impact <br /> References Used: <br /> 3 <br /> Mandatory Findings of Significance <br /> Based on evidence provided in this Initial Study, QTSC makes the following findings: <br /> a, The project❑ has Z does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the <br /> habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten t0 <br /> eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or <br /> animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. <br /> Page 23 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.