My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS AND WORK PLANS 2004-2014
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAGNER
>
200
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009002
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS AND WORK PLANS 2004-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2019 7:04:53 PM
Creation date
2/22/2019 3:01:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
FileName_PostFix
AND WORK PLANS 2004-2014
RECORD_ID
PR0009002
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004040
FACILITY_NAME
SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAGNER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
14331007
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
200 N WAGNER AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appendix C: Initial Study Checklist Former Marley Cooling Tower Company,Stockton,CA <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated <br /> ® Less Than Significant Impact <br /> ❑ No Impact <br /> e. Result in inadequate parking capacity. <br /> Impact Analysis: Residents will be required to park down the street from the drilling equipment (while in front of the <br /> residents' homes). This will be a temporary inconvenience and will be alleviated once drilling is complete. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Impact <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated <br /> ® Less Than Significant Impact <br /> ❑ No Impact <br /> f. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, b''cycle <br /> racks). <br /> Impact Analysis: The activities should not effect alternative transportation. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Impact <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated <br /> ® Less Than Significant Impact <br /> ❑ No Impact <br /> References Used: <br /> 3 <br /> �16 Utilities and Service Systems <br /> —— —, <br /> Description of Baseline Environmental Conditions:Ail services are supplied by the city or county in the area of the site and <br /> should not be affected by the proposed activities. <br /> Analysis as to whether or not project activities would: <br /> a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board. <br /> Impact Analysis: There is no anticipated plan to exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board. Activities will be conducted in compliance with existing permits. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Impact <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated <br /> ® Less Than Significant Impact <br /> ❑ No Impact <br /> b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, <br /> the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. <br /> Impact Analysis: There should not be a need to expand existing facilities. There are no plans to expand the existing <br /> treatment facility. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Impact <br /> ❑ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated <br /> ❑ Less Than Significant Impact <br /> ®No impact <br /> c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the <br /> construction of which could cause significant environmental effects, <br /> Page 22 or 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.