Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE 9 <br /> ANALYSIS OF CHROMIUM CONCENTRATIONS AND REDUCTION POTENTIAL <br /> FORMER MARLEY COOLING TOWER SITE <br /> STOCKTON,CALIFORNIA <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> Percent Change m Description of Trend for Ke Indicator Parameters <br /> Fourth Quarter 2012 Concentration p � Y Potential for <br /> Monitoring Concentration(µ Concentrations fromg/L) has been Further <br /> Maximum Oxidation Reduction Recommendation` <br /> Well Total Chromium Total Chromium Below 50µg/L Chromium Iron Manganese Total Organic Carbon Potential Chromium <br /> Chromium VI Chromium VI Since e Reduction <br /> Background and Compliance Wells <br /> 1/2009(Before Revert to sitewide compliance monitoring <br /> MW-7 6J NA -89% -75% 2008) Stable below WQO Near baseline Near baseline Low Positive Low programd <br /> MW-201 14 NA -78% -21% 1/2009(Before Stable below WQO Near baseline Near baseline Low Positive Low Perform quarterly monitoring for total dissolved <br /> 2008) chromium and field parameters only per the MRP <br /> MW-202 7J NA -79% -1% Before 2008 Stable below WQO Near W and Baseline(ND) Low Positive Low Revert to sitewide compliance monitoring <br /> baselinin e program <br /> Below WQO,Near Revert to sitewide compliance monitoring <br /> MW-210 4J NA -76% -29% Before 2008 Stable below WQO baseline program Below WQO Low Positive Low d <br /> Below WQO,Near Revert to sitewide compliance monitoring <br /> MW-302 4J NA -89% -52% Before 2008 Stable below WQO Baseline(ND) Low Positive Low d <br /> baseline program <br /> MW-304 4J NA -69% -17% Before 2008 Stable below WQO Above baseline and Baseline(ND) Low Positive Low Perform quarterly monitoring for total dissolved <br /> WQO chromium and field parameters only per the MRP <br /> Revert to sitewide compliance monitoring <br /> MW-401 4J NA -100% 0% Before 2008 Stable below WQO Below WQO Baseline(ND) Low Positive Low d <br /> program <br /> MW-310 91 NA -80% -6% Before 2008 Stable below WQO Above baseline,above Baseline(ND) Low Positive Low Perform quarterly monitoring for total dissolved <br /> but near WQO chromium and field parameters only per the MRP <br /> Below WQO,Near Below WQO,Near Revert to sitewide compliance monitoring <br /> MW-211 3J NA -82% -1% Before 2008 Stable below WQO Low Positive Low d <br /> baseline baseline program <br /> MW-325 81 NA -74% -29% Before 2008 Stable below WQO Above baseline,below Baseline(ND) Low Positive Low Perform quarterly monitoring for total dissolved <br /> WQO chromium and field parameters only per the MRP <br /> Notes: <br /> a =Dates in parentheses represent chromium VI,if the date is different than for total chromium. <br /> b =Potential for further chromium reduction is based on the presence of iron,manganese,total organic carbon,and depressed oxidation reduction potential readings,as discussed by chemical in Section 4.0. <br /> ° =Recommendation is based on completion of injections nearby and more than 2 years of chromium concentrations below the WQO. Seethe discussion in Section 8.0 and the decision logic diagram(Figure 5). <br /> d =Well would continue to be routinely sampled for chromium and other parameters as specified for the sitewide groundwater monitoring program in the MRP. <br /> Bold=Concentration greater than the WQO <br /> µg/L=microgram per liter <br /> J=Estimated laboratory value <br /> MRP=Monitoring and Reporting Program No.R5-2007-0126 issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board,Central Valley Region,September 13,2007. <br /> ND=not detected <br /> NM=not meaningful because the chemical has not been detected above the laboratory analytical reporting limit. <br /> WQO=water quality objective <br />