Laserfiche WebLink
1 1 <br /> (b) Impacts Adequately Addressed -- Identify which effects from the above Checklist (Section C) were within the scope of, and <br /> adequately analyzed in, an earlier document pursuant to appl cable legal standards. <br /> (c) Mitigation Measures - - For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," specify whether any <br /> applicable mitigation measures are incorporated or refined from the earlier document to address site-specific conditions for <br /> the project. <br /> (d) CEQA Findings, Statements of Overriding Consideration, and Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Programs - - Indicate whether <br /> applicable previously adopted CEQA Findings, overriding considerations, and mitigation monitoring/reporting provisions <br /> have been relied upon and incorporated into the proposed project, pursuant to Sections 15150 (Incorporation by Reference) <br /> and 15152(f)(3) (Tiering) of the State CEQA Guidelines. <br /> Adequately Addressed Earlier Mitigation/Findings/ Not <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE: By Earlier Analysis Monitoring Incorporated Applicable <br /> 1. AESTHETICS ® ® ❑ <br /> 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES ® ❑ <br /> 3. AIR QUALITY ® ® ❑ <br /> 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ® ® ❑ <br /> 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES ® ® ❑ <br /> 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ® ® ❑ <br /> 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ® ® ❑ <br /> 8, HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ® ® ❑ <br /> 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING ® ® ❑ <br /> 10. MINERAL RESOURCES ® ® ❑ <br /> 11. NOISE ® ® ❑ <br /> 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING ® ® ❑ <br /> 13. PUBLIC SERVICES ® ® ❑ <br /> 14. RECREATION ® ® ❑ <br /> 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC ® ® ❑ <br /> 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ® ® ❑ <br /> 17. OTHER ISSUE(S): ❑ ❑ <br /> 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ® ® ❑ <br /> E. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED Com tete bv Lead Agency r Authorized Consultant - -Check ✓ as <br /> applicable]: <br /> The environmental factors checked below would potentially be affected by this project (i.e., the project would involve at least one <br /> impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact"), as indicated in the preceding Checklist (Section C) and the Earlier Analysis (Section <br /> D): <br /> ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agricultural Reso rtes ® Air Quality <br /> ❑ Biological Resources ® Cultural ResourCE s ❑ Geology/Soils <br /> ® Hazards and Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning <br /> ❑ Mineral Resources ® Noise ❑ PopuIationlHousing <br /> ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ® Trans portation/Traffic <br /> ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Other Issue(s) (See Section C) ® Mandatory Findings of Significance <br /> F. REFERENCES CITED AND PERSONS CONSULTED Com feted 6 Lead Agency or Authorized Consultant <br /> E1R6-90, Amended West-End Urban Renewal Project No. 1 <br /> IS29-96,Weber Point/Banner Island Master Development Plan <br /> Kitty Walker, Senior Economic Development Analyst, MRD - City of 5 ockton <br /> Victor Machado, Landca e Architect, PSR City of Stockton <br /> Diane Keil Smith, Senior Planner, Comm. Dev. -City of Stockton <br /> 15 <br />