SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE

Home Browse Search

``'Less than Potentially -`Significant Less-than- Significant w/Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 17. OTHER ISSUE(S) -Would the project: a. Result in, contribute to, or substantially affect other environmental issues(s)? If so, specify below and evaluate: (1) ❑ ❑ ❑ Supporting Documentation/References Cited: 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality ❑ ❑ ❑ of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate I a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? l b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited ® ❑ ❑ ❑ but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c. Does the project have environmental effects that will ❑ ❑ ® ❑ cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Supporting Documentation/References Cited: Refer to Amended est-End DEIR6-90, Section G and IS29-96, Section 4.2. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for air quality,which was a cumulatively significant impact. D. EARLIER ANALYSIS (Completed by Lead Agency or Authorized Consultant): f If not applicable, check (✓) here ❑j Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, Progran, EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Initial Study/Negative Decla ation (Section 15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines). The previously-certified or adopted environmental document(s) and a iy applicable adopted mitigation measures, CEQA "Findings", statements of overriding consideration, and mitigation monitoring/rep rting programs are incorporated by reference, as cited below, and discussed on attached sheet(s) to identify the following: (a) Earlier Analysis Used — Identify earlier analyses that adequately address project impacts and that are available for i review at the City of Stockton Community Development Department, Planning Division 345 N. El Dorado Street, Stockton, CA: Initial Study/Negative Declaration File No.:' IS29-96 Title: Weber Point/Banner Island Master Development Plan State Clearinghouse No.: 96102024 Final EER File No.: EIR-90 Title: Amended West-End Urban Renewal Project No, 1 State Clearinghouse No.: 90021082 Other Environmental Document No. Title: State Clearinghouse No.: 14