Laserfiche WebLink
James L. Tjosvold, P.E. <br /> April 22, 1997 <br /> Page 3 <br /> The Area I soil analytical results from the December, 1996 field work have been incorporated <br /> into the VLEACH model (creating additional polygons). Additional sensitivity analysis was <br /> performed on the VLEACH and groundwater mixing cell models in preparation of a meeting <br /> between PG&E and DTSC to discuss and agree on the final input parameters to be used in the <br /> VLEACH and groundwater mixing cell models (these models are being used to help evaluate <br /> remedial alternatives in the FS). <br /> On March 4, 1997, PG&E submitted a technical memorandum with proposed degradation <br /> rates for benzene, naphthalene and chrysene in soil and in groundwater(appropriate <br /> degradation rates are to be incorporated into the VLEACH and mixing cell models). The <br /> proposed degradation rates were derived from an extensive literature search. In the technical <br /> memorandum, it was suggested that two times the longest half-life found in the literature for <br /> these chemicals be used in the models (to be conservative). These proposed degradation rates <br /> were discussed during a March 7, 1997 telephone conference call between PG&E, DTSC and <br /> the RWQCB and during a March 24, 1997 meeting between PG&E and DTSC. At the March <br /> 24, 1997 meeting, it was agreed that the longest half-lives found in the literature will be used <br /> as the degradation rates for these chemicals. These degradation rates will be incorporated into <br /> the VLEACH and groundwater mixing cell models. <br /> On March 24, 1997, PG&E and DTSC met to: discuss and agree on the VLEACH model and <br /> groundwater mixing cell model input parameters (including chemical degradation rates); to <br /> present the results of the VLEACH model after incorporation of the December, 1996 Area I <br /> soil analytical results; and to briefly present the proposed soil and groundwater technologies <br /> and the remedial alternative selection criteria. At the meeting, DTSC discussed the <br /> RWQCB's future role in the project, namely that the RWQCB will not be actively <br /> participating in future project meetings and will rely on DTSC to represent its interests. The <br /> schedule for completing the FS was discussed, with an emphasis on the short time frame <br /> remaining to complete the FS tasks. Because of this, agreement on key items must be reached <br /> at every meeting to maintain the current schedule. The input parameters for the VLEACH <br /> and groundwater mixing cell models were agreed upon at the meeting, however, in the FS, <br /> DTSC wants to see a thorough discussion of these input parameters and the rationale for <br /> using them. The latest modeling results predicting the concentrations of benzene, naphthalene <br /> and chrysene beneath the site and at the site perimeter were presented at the meeting. Revised <br /> initial and secondary screening of soil and groundwater technologies and suggested <br /> preliminary remedial alternatives were presented at the meeting. The group was asked to <br /> think about their own preferred alternatives prior to the next meeting on April 24-25, 1997. <br /> On April 3, 1997, PG&E submitted minutes from the March 24, 1997 meeting and draft <br /> Chapters 1-5 for the FS (for DTSC and RWQCB advance review and comment). <br />