COMPLIANCE INFO 2018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SWRCB, January 2002 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TF.STTNG Page 10 of Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sums ❑ Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested ❑ Test Method Developed By: ❑Sump Manufacturer 0lndustry Standard ❑Professional Engineer []Other (Specify) Test Method Used: ❑Pressure ❑ Vacuum ElHydrostatic ❑ Other (Spec) Test Equipment Used: TS -STS Equipment Resolution: 0.00° Fill Sump # 91 Fill Sump # 87-1 Fill Sump # 87-2 Fill Sump # 87 Slave Sump Diameter: 39.00" 39.00" 39,00" 39.00" Sump Depth: 72.00° 72.00° 72.00" 72.00° Height from Tank Top to Top of 18.00" 18.00" 18.00" 18.00" Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: ao.00" ao.00" ao.00" ao.00" Condition of sump prior to Clean dry Clean dry Clean dry Clean dry testing: Portion of Sump Tested Highest penetration Highest penetration Highest penetration Highest penetration Sump Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and 5min 5min 5min 5min starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (R,): SEE INCON RESULTS SEE INCON RESULTS SEE INCON RESULTS SEE INCON RESULTS Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: 15min 15min 15min 15min Chane in Reading (RF-Ri): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002" 0.002" 0.002" 0.002° Test Result: O Pass ❑ Fail O Pass ❑ Fail O Pass ❑ Fail 0 Pass ❑ Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? O Yes []No O Yes ❑ No 0 Yes ❑ No 0 Yes ❑ No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is []Yes ❑ No ONA OYes ❑No ONA []Yes []No ONA []Yes []No ONA detected? Was sensor removed for testing? O Yes No ❑NA []Yes No ❑NA OYes ❑No [INAOti'es []No❑ NA Was sensor properly replaced and OYes ❑No 0 N OYes 0 N 0 N OYes ONO ❑NA OYes ❑No [INA verified functional after testing? Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follotir-mp forfailed tests)