Laserfiche WebLink
r 2:00' 390d 0550 172 Eos• -2 : 11 26. 82 Lfdti <br /> ^TATE QE CALIFOfIMA— <br /> PETE W"-SON'Gormrror <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY <br /> DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL <br /> 10151 CROYDON WAY,SORE 0 <br /> SACRAMENTO.CA 95827.2106 <br /> (916) 855-7700 <br /> February 7, 1992 <br /> Mr. Harvey Friedman <br /> Friedman Bag Company <br /> 801 East Commerce <br /> Los Angeles, California 90012 <br /> Dear Mr. Friedman: <br /> GREAT WESTERN CHEMICAL/FRIEDMAN BAG 824 SOUTH CENTER STREET, <br /> STOCKTON <br /> I have reviewed the information provided by your legal <br /> counsal, Mr. Sherman Lenske. On January 27, 1992, I visited your <br /> property in Stockton to acquaint myself with the site. Based on <br /> the document review and site visit, a streamlined version of the <br /> Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) is appropriate. <br /> Interim Guidance for Preparation of a Preliminary Endangerment <br /> Assessment Report, which was sent to Mr. Lenske last month, <br /> should be used in preparing the PEA. The PEA Report should <br /> included the following: <br /> 2 .2. 1 Site Description and History <br /> 2.2.2 Apparent Problem: This should include the areas <br /> along the fence for spent etch material, behind the building <br /> for trichloroethane, and inside the building as noted by <br /> WHF Environmental consultants. <br /> 2 .2.3 Environmental Setting: Address the soil and water <br /> pathways and note that there was no threat of air release. <br /> 2. 2 .4 Sampling Activities and Requirements: This should <br /> include limited resampling of the area near the former drum <br /> storage area as there is no quality assurance/quality <br /> control documentation provided with the sample results from <br /> June 1990, and the areas identified in 2.2.2 . It will be <br /> possible to conduct the high pressure cleaning of the spill <br /> areas inside the building under the oversight of the PEA. <br /> 2 . 2 .5 Human Health and Environmental Threat Assessment: <br /> This section should discuss the potential threat posed by <br /> any contamination found during the sampling effort. If no <br /> significant contamination is detected, this section will be <br /> very abbreviated. <br /> 2 . 2, 6 Conclusions and Recommendations: .After the <br /> cleaning of the inside of the build and if no significant <br /> contamination is detected outside, the recommendation could <br /> be for no further action at the site. <br /> _Q)_ <br /> n,-c n�rw7_Cr)G .M.I]M1l9 )!71'l7tJ I,MC.J•T T <br /> 7c, <br />