Laserfiche WebLink
r. <br /> r« <br /> Monitoring Well Installation Report—Former Unocal Station#0123,Tracy,CA <br /> January 17,2001 <br /> parking lot to determine if any abandoned USTs existed beneath the site, and exploratory borings to <br /> collect soil and groundwater samples The underground survey detected no large metal anomalies, and <br /> concluded that there were no USTs beneath the site However, hydrocarbon-impacted groundwater was <br /> detected in the northern portion of the site <br /> In May 1995, nine exploratory soil borings were drilled and three groundwater monitoring wells (U-1 <br /> through U-3) were installed by Pacific Environmental Group, Inc (PEG) at the subject site Exploratory <br /> test pits were dug and two abandoned USTs were encountered at the northern property boundary, beneath <br /> the 11'h Street sidewalk In November 1996,the two abandoned 550-gallon USTs were removed A third <br /> UST that was encountered during the removal activities was abandoned in place by grout injection One <br /> groundwater monitoring well (U-4) was installed in December 1996 in the location of the removed USTs <br /> to evaluate soil and groundwater conditions <br /> On October 7, 1998, PEG drilled and installed two groundwater monitoring wells (U-5 and U-6) and one <br /> soil boring (B-4) Soil samples collected from the borings had detectable concentrations of total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) (220 parts per million (ppm) at l 1 feet below ground surface <br /> (bgs) in U-6)and total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd)(21 5 ppm at 10 feet bgs in B-4 and 12 3 <br /> ppm at 11 feet bgs in U-6) Benzene,methyl tert-butyl ether(MtBE), lead, or volatile organic compounds <br /> (VOCs) were not detected in the soil samples Grab groundwater samples had concentrations of TPHg <br /> (968 parts per billion (ppb) in U-6) and TPHd (115 ppb in B-4 and 312 ppb in U-6) Benzene, MtBE, or <br />• lead were not detected in the groundwater samples <br /> One soil boring B-5 was advanced at the northwest corner of I Ith Street and Central Avenue on January <br /> 12, 2000 by GR A soil sample collected from the boring at 7 feet below ground surface (bgs) had a <br /> detectable concentration of TPHd at 2 21 ppm TPHg or benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes <br /> (BTEX) were not detected in the soil sample A grab groundwater sample from the boring had 66,700 <br /> ppb of TPHg, 29 6 ppb of TPHd, and 36 2 ppb of benzene Oxygenates were not detected is the soil or <br /> grab groundwater samples <br /> Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling <br /> Groundwater monitoring and sampling has been conducted quarterly since June 2, 1995, in wells U-1, <br /> U-2,and U-3, since March 3, 1997, in well U-4, and since October 22, 1998, in wells U-5 and U-6 In the <br /> most recent event on December 6, 2000, TPHg, BTEX, or MtBE were not detected in any of the wells <br /> except for well U-4 TPHg and benzene were reported in well U-4 at concentrations of 149 and 3 68 ppb, <br /> respectively Diesel range hydrocarbons were reported in all wells at the site ranging in concentrations <br /> from 290 to 430 ppb, but the chemical analytical report (Appendix F) noted that those values were from <br /> discrete peaks <br /> The chromatograms showing the discrete peaks are in Appendix G At the request of GR, Mr Alan <br /> Kemp of Sequoia Analytical (FLAP #1271) reviewed the chromatograms In a telephone call with Mr <br /> Kemp on January 10, 2001, he stated that the discrete peaks were not caused by diesel, nor did any other <br /> type of petroleum hydrocarbons cause them He could not determine from available information what <br /> caused the peaks <br /> 24007305-1 2 <br />