Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 2 <br /> Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> To: Bill Cook <br /> Subject: RE: Work Plan for Raymond Investment Corporation <br /> Good morning, Bill. <br /> Don't bother sendinn a revised work plan. In the letter I have drafted in response to your work plan (that is <br /> currently going through the review process), our department is recommending that MW-5 be installed with a <br /> vertical boring screened between 25 and 45 feet bsg; MW-4D be screened between 60 and 70 feet bsg; MW-6 <br /> and, if needed, MW-8, MW-9, and MW-10 be screened between 25 and 45 feet bsg. Our department is not <br /> approving MW-7 at this time but is recommending the advancement of a boring south of the former LIST on an <br /> adjacent parcel. Since our department is recommending that most of the wells be screened at a different interval <br /> than what was proposed in the work plan for Raymond Investment Corporation, I would not bother revising the <br /> work plan until you respond to the hardcopy letter that should be sent within a week. <br /> Vicki McCartney, Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 600 East Main Street <br /> Stockton,California 95202 <br /> Phone: (209)468-9852 <br /> Fax: (209)468-3433 <br /> Email: ymccartpl r)sjcehd.coni <br /> From: Bill Cook [mailto:bcook@condorearth.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 9:04 AM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Work Plan for Raymond Investment Corporation <br /> You are quite right. I apologize for the inconsistency. The decision to propose wells to the deeper <br /> depth of 45 feet was made in the last draft and I did not carry the change through. Section 3.0 <br /> MW6-10 well screen depths should read 30 to 45 feet, not 40 feet as is in the work plan. And <br /> Table 1 total depths for MW6-10 should have been changed to 45 feet. <br /> On the other hand, the apparent inconsistency with regard to MW5 in section 3.0 and 4.2 is <br /> actually just a matter of wording. The complication arises from the angled well issue. In section <br /> 3.0 the well screen interval is described as "screen length of 35 to 50 feet from the surface". The <br /> length in section 3.0 is the actual linear distance down an angled hole, `along the diagonal', to an <br /> effective vertical depth of 30 to 45 feet below ground surface as described in Section 4.2. In <br /> Section 4.2 the MW5 well screen interval is described as 30 to 45 feet below ground surface. That <br /> would be if it was measured vertically. Please refer to Figure 5. <br /> Should we send you a revised work plan today or tomorrow? <br /> From: Vicki McCartney [EH] [mailto:vmccartney@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 10:33 AM <br /> To: Bill Cook <br /> Subject: Work Pian for Raymond investment Corporation <br /> Good morning, Bill. <br /> 10/8/2009 <br />