My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
11396
>
2800 - Aboveground Petroleum Storage Program
>
PR0528240
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:55:56 PM
Creation date
2/28/2019 1:21:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2800 - Aboveground Petroleum Storage Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0528240
PE
2832
FACILITY_ID
FA0003786
FACILITY_NAME
T&T TRUCKING INC
STREET_NUMBER
11396
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
05926010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
11396 N HWY 99 E FRONTAGE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
FRuiz
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
use. He did mention that there were deficiencies in the tanks which would categorize them as unsuitable for continued <br /> use. The certified inspector stated that he would conduct and submit and inspection report that met the requirements <br /> of the standard. He also stated that he was under the impression that the metal thickness test was the equivalent to a <br /> full SP-001 inspection report, something that I did not find in the standard. I mentioned to him that it was my <br /> understanding from reading the standard that the metal thickness test if part of the inspection but does not meet the <br /> requirement of the standard by itself. <br /> »»The item of concern now is that part of what he submitted states that the tanks "passed It's industry standard <br /> testing" and that "no defects were observed throughout all of the fuel and oil product tanks and is in compliance the CFR <br /> 112.8(c)(6)testing requirements." <br /> »»Again, thank you for answering my questions and for taking your time to read this. <br /> »»Cesar Ruvalcaba <br /> »»San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department Environmental <br /> »» Health Specialist <br /> »» 1868 East Hazelton Ave <br /> »»Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> »»Office (209)953-6213 Fax (209) 464-0138 email: cruvalcaba@sjcehd.com <br /> »»-----Original Message----- <br /> »» From: Dana Schmidt<dschmidt@steeltank.com> <br /> »»Sent:Tuesday, February 12, 2019 8:42 AM <br /> »»To: Cesar Ruvalcaba [EH] <cruvalcaba@sjcehd.com> <br /> »»Subject: RE: SP-001 Certified Inspector Inspection Reports <br /> »» Reports need to meet the requirements of the standard. <br /> »» Dana Schmidt, P.E. <br /> »»Standards Engineer <br /> »»STI/SPFA <br /> »»944 Donata Court <br /> »» Lake Zurich, IL 60047 <br /> »» Direct Phone: (847) 550-3832 <br /> »»-----Original Message----- <br /> »» From: Cesar Ruvalcaba [EH] <cruvaIca ba@sjcehd.com> <br /> »»Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 10:39 AM <br /> »»To: Dana Schmidt<dschmidt@steeltank.com> <br /> »»Subject: RE: SP-001 Certified Inspector Inspection Reports <br /> »»The certified inspector should call me today so we can discuss the report. This is where I wanted an opinion on the <br /> final report. Should the inspection summary include all applicable inspection criteria listed in chapter 7 or can the <br /> summary just be a metal thickness testing report with a sentence stating that the "tank passed it's industry standard <br /> testing" and what seems to be a modified monthly inspection facility checklist. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.