My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
440
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0536618
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2019 3:41:55 PM
Creation date
3/1/2019 3:04:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0536618
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0021026
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON CHARTER WAY COMMON PLUME
STREET_NUMBER
440
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16503003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
440 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. Page 1 of 1 <br /> Lori Duncan [EH] <br /> From: Murphy, Mike [mmurphy@cambria-env.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 8:57 AM <br /> To: Lori Duncan [EH] <br /> Subject: 440 W. Charter Way, Stockton <br /> Importance: High <br /> Lori, <br /> I am preparing the work plan you requested in your November 2, 2006 letter. I am also working on the updated <br /> SCM and cross sections. I will be proposing to install at least additional B zone wells. In looking at the data we <br /> have and what I plan on proposing, I think that we should hold off on the updated cross sections and SCM until <br /> after the site investigation is complete. I think the new data should be included in the updated SCM and cross <br /> sections and I do not want to duplicate this effort a few months down the road. Holding off now is a better use of <br /> my client's money. Do you approve of this? If so, I can document this in the work plan and indicate that the <br /> SCM/cross section will be included with the investigation report. This approach makes the most sense to me. Let <br /> me know what you think. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Mike <br /> Mike Murphy <br /> Senior Project Scientist <br /> Cambria Environmental Technology, Inc. <br /> 19449 Riverside Drive, Suite 230 <--------- NEW ADDRESSH <br /> Sonoma, CA 95476 <br /> Phone: 707.933.2367 <br /> FAX: 707.935.6649 <br /> Cell: 510.385.3116 <br /> A Woman-Owned Business <br /> This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the safe use of the intended recipient.Any review or distribution by <br /> others is strictlyprohibited.If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all copies. <br /> ok <br /> 12/13/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.