My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012861
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
441
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544208
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2019 6:15:48 PM
Creation date
3/1/2019 4:44:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012861
RECORD_ID
PR0544208
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0003628
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO STATION #2168*
STREET_NUMBER
441
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14707607
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
441 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J <br /> MARCO VAS <br /> Sarrrfrle Collection DaEie(,$): (9 <br /> MARCO Site Number: Senior Revicrrer: � <br /> (ter Revic ver: / O O � <br /> Data Review Clrecklist for I!'lethods "6I <br /> t <br /> a Yes No NIA Notes <br /> Item <br /> 1. Do the dates sampled and sample fDs agree with COC? <br /> 2- Were the samples received in the appropriate condition? <br /> ' is this documented?(QAPP Table 4-I) <br /> 3_ Are all report forms present for samples listed on COC? I� <br /> i <br /> ve present and complete? <br /> 4- Is the case narrati <br /> 5. Do the analytes reported agree with the analyte list n„ <br /> requested on the COC? �1 <br /> + 6, Do the reporting limits(RLS) meet the specifications of <br /> the QAPP?(QAPP Table 7-1) /Y <br /> 7 Are the RLs adjusted for dilutions/sample size/percent <br /> moisture,if applicable? <br /> $. <br /> Have the holding times been met?(QAPP Table 4-!) <br /> l y. Are the reporting units correct and consistent? <br />` (QAPP Table 7-1) v <br /> 10. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least one <br /> method blank/preparation batch? <br /> Are the method blank results below RLs? �( <br /> It no,qualify data ri'ith 5 and 10 Times rule. ' <br /> 1 ` 12- Were the samples spiked.vith surrogates? x <br /> 13. Were the laboratory surrogate recovery criteria met for x <br /> each sample? (See attached-) 1 <br /> { 14. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least one set of <br /> MSINISI7slpreparation batch? <br /> t r IS. Were the laboratory MSIMSD criteria met? <br /> t (See attached.) <br /> 16. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least one <br /> i LCSlpreparation batch? <br /> 17. Were the laboratory LCS/LCSD criteria met? r\ <br /> (See attached.) <br /> 18. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least one lab v <br /> duplicatelpfeparation batch(if no MSD/LCSD)? !1 <br /> 19. Were the lab duplicate RPD criteria met?(See attached.) Y <br /> t 20. Were equipment blanks collected? C� <br /> i2t, Are the equipment blank results below ltLs? <br /> if no,qualify data with 5-and 10-Times rule- <br /> 22. -\Vere field duplicates collected? <br /> 23 Were field duplicate RPD criteria met? <br /> {QAPP Table 6-1) <br /> .-� X, <br /> 24. Based on the data provided,are there any additional QC <br /> 2 <br /> issues? <br /> __ .. - "wh the hard;-nnv woorl'r. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.