Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> F:� <br /> f <br /> ❑ The elevated reporting limits were[he result of dilutions performed by the laboratory in order to quantitate a target L7 The elevated reporting limits reported in the Method <br /> dual�te(s} <br /> were due to presence of analysis of samples <br /> ❑ The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples in these samples <br /> r- <br /> have been confirmed as gasoline/diesel. <br /> ❑ The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples <br /> Peaks Present Pe P nt In the gasoline quantitation range, however, the peakspresent do not res/are due <br /> e pattern hFo�aao <br /> graphic <br /> F ❑ The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples gasoline. <br /> is/are due to a discrete peals in the C--C—range CI The reported results for (probably <br /> be considered estin samples <br /> r imated because the associated continuing calibration standard was outside�-� of acceptance Should <br /> P ce criteria. <br /> The reported results for �o <br /> ncl c in samples %] <br /> -40 <br /> F be biased low because the as <br /> cont calibra <br /> 1? tion standard was outside of acceptance criteria.F may <br /> ❑ The reported results for � <br /> in samples <br /> be biased high because the associated continuing may <br /> calibration standard was outside of acceptance criteria. <br /> � <br /> ❑ The reported results for � <br /> in samples <br /> for these analytes were performedmay be biased low since the analyses <br /> ❑ The reported <br /> days beyond the U.S.EPA recommended holding time of <br /> results,for -�days. <br /> in samples <br /> may be biased low/high as demonstrated by a low/high surrogate recovery due to matrix <br /> EI The reported results for interference. <br /> in samples <br /> be considered estimated due to a high relative percent difference reported between the associated LCS and should <br /> LI The reported results for LCSD. <br /> in samples i <br /> be biased low/high due to a low/liigh average percent recovery reported in the associated MS/MSD a may <br /> ❑ The reported results for nalysls. <br />(' in samples <br /> be biased low/high due to a low/high average percent recovery reported in the associated MS/MSD analysis. may <br /> ❑ The reported results for , <br /> r <br /> in samples <br /> be considered estimated because the primary and confirmation column results differed b should <br /> ❑ The reported results for y greater than 40%RPD. <br /> considered estimated; the samples were initially analyzed withi <br /> performed out of holding time. n holding time but required dilution. The d lut ondwas . <br /> f <br />