My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012861
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
441
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544208
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2019 6:15:48 PM
Creation date
3/1/2019 4:44:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012861
RECORD_ID
PR0544208
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0003628
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO STATION #2168*
STREET_NUMBER
441
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14707607
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
441 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r P,' <br /> e"' <br /> B)"/ARCO Site Number: <br /> RSample Collection Date(s): �j ltc <br /> Re"ievver: LA-Y), <br /> Senior Revievv-er: WO <br /> Data Review Checldist for Methods 'R-Z(00J�� `! <br /> Item Yes No NIA <br /> Notes <br /> 1. Do the dates sampled and sample IDs agree with <br /> COC? <br /> 2. Were the samples received in the appropriate <br /> condition? Is this documented? <br /> 3. Are all report forret present for samples listed on <br /> COC? <br /> 4. Is the case narrative present and complete? <br /> M +/ <br /> I <br /> 5_ Do the analytes reported agree with the analyte I <br /> list requested on the COC? v 1 <br /> 6. Do the reporting limits(RLs)meet the 7 <br /> specifications of the QA-PP? � <br /> 7. Are the RLs adjusted for dilutions/sample <br /> I <br /> size/percent moisture, if applicable? ✓ i <br /> 8. Have the holding times been met? <br /> 9_ Are the reporting units correct and consistent? ! <br /> 10. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least r <br /> one melhod blank/preparation batch? r ; <br /> 1 I. Are the method blank results below RLs? <br /> 12. Were the samples spiked with surrogates? <br /> 13. Were the laboratory surrogate recovery criteria <br /> _ met for each sample? ✓' <br /> 14. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least N 1V <br /> one set of MS/MSDs/preparation batch? �f <br /> 15. Were the laboratory MS/MSD criteria met? <br /> tr <br /> 16. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least <br /> one LCS/preparation batch? ✓ <br /> 17. Were the laboratory LCS/LCSD criteria meth I <br /> 18. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least ; <br /> one lab duplicate/preparation batch(if no MSD)? ✓ I <br /> 19. Were the lab duplicate RPD criteria met? <br /> 20. Were equipment blanks collected? <br /> 21. Are the equipment blank results below RLs? <br /> 22, Were Geld duplicates collected? <br /> ) ✓ <br /> 23_ Were field duplicate RPD criteria met? j <br /> � I <br /> 24. Based on the data provided,are there anyEtC ! <br /> i + additional QC issues? <br /> 25. Do the data tables match the hardcopy report? <br /> a <br /> J:1I3P-ARCO1ChenustrylChecklists and TemplateslDQI Checklist Generic-Air.Aoueous. Soil rinr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.