Laserfiche WebLink
The elevated reporting limits wcre the result of dilutions perfomTed.by the labors <br /> tory in order to quantitate a target <br /> were due to presence of arralJ-te{s); <br /> Q The elevated reporting limits reported in the Method <br /> analysis of samples <br /> o The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples to these samples_ <br /> have been confirmed as gasoline/diesel. <br /> ❑ The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples <br /> peaks present in the gasoline quantitation range, however, the peaks present do not re embl�ue to ahe pattern <br /> gasoline.a <br /> phic <br /> Q The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples oline. <br /> a <br /> is/are due to a discrete peak in the C--C—ran e <br /> g (probably <br /> ❑ The reported results for <br /> in samples <br /> i <br /> be considered estimated because the associated continuing calibration standard was outside ofacceptance criteria. <br /> o The reported results for <br /> in samples <br /> I <br /> be biased low because the associated continuing calibration standard was outside of acceptance criteria, may <br /> © The reported results for <br /> a in samples <br /> i <br /> be biased high because the associated continuing calibration standard was outside of acceptance criteria. may <br /> F ❑ The reported results for <br /> in samples <br /> i <br /> may be biased low since the analyses <br /> for these analytes were performed days beyond the U.S. EPA recommended holding time of da s. <br /> y <br /> ❑ The reported results for <br /> in samples <br /> may be biased low/high as demonstrated by a low/high surrogate recovery due to matrix interference. <br /> L <br /> ❑ The reported results for <br /> in samples should <br /> be considered estimated due to a high relative percent difference reported between the associated LCS and LCSD. <br /> I <br /> o The reported results for <br /> in samples <br /> be biased low/high due to a low/high average percent recovery reported in the associated MS/MSD analysis. may <br /> ❑ The reported results for <br /> rn samples <br /> be biased Iow/high due to a low/high average percent recovery reported in the associated MS/MSD analysis. may <br /> �i <br /> ❑ The reported results for <br /> i <br /> in samples <br /> should <br /> be considered estimated because the primary and confirmation column results differed by greater than 40% RPD. i <br /> ❑ The reported results for <br /> in samples should be , <br /> considered estimated,- the samples were initially analyzed within holding time but required dilution. The dilution ��as i <br /> Performed out'of holding time. <br />