My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012861
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
441
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544208
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2019 6:15:48 PM
Creation date
3/1/2019 4:44:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012861
RECORD_ID
PR0544208
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0003628
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO STATION #2168*
STREET_NUMBER
441
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14707607
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
441 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t." . <br /> BP/ARCO Site Number: 2-1(013 MARCO <br /> Reviewer: Cly-) Sample Collection Date(s): <br /> Senior Revieiver- )Jig <br /> Data Reviesv Checklist for Methods 2t0[j <br /> Item Yes No N/A Notes <br /> L Do the dates sampled and sample IDs agree with <br /> F. COC"? <br /> 2. Were the samples received in the appropriate <br /> t^: <br /> condition? Is this documented? <br /> 3. Are all report forms present for samples listed on <br /> COC? <br /> 4. Is the case narrative present and complete? <br /> ✓ <br /> S. Do the analytes reported agree with the analyte <br /> list requested on the COC? v <br /> 6. Do the reporting limits(RLs)meet the <br /> specifications of the QAPP? ✓ <br /> 7. Are the RIs adjusted for dilutions/sample <br /> size/percent moisture,if applicable? <br /> 8. Have the holding times been met? ' <br /> 9. Are the reporting units correct and consistent? <br /> 10. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least <br /> one method blank/preparation batch? ✓ <br /> 11. Are the method blank results below RLs? <br /> 12_ Were the samples spiked with surrogates? <br /> Y � <br /> 13. Were the laboratory surrogate recovery criteria <br /> met for each sample? t� <br /> 14. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least <br /> one set of MS/MSDs/preparation batch? NPS _ N Q v f <br /> 15. Were the laboratory MS/MSD criteria met? <br /> 16. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least <br /> one LCS/preparation batch? <br /> 17. Were the laboratory LCS/LCSD criteria met? <br /> 18. Did the Iaboratory prepare and analyze at least <br /> one lab duplicate/preparation batch(if no MSD)? <br /> 19. Were the lab duplicate RPD criteria met? <br /> 20_ Were equipment blanks collected? <br /> 21. Are the equipment blank results below RLP <br /> 22. Were field duplicates collected? <br /> 23. Were field duplicate RPD criteria met? <br /> f <br /> 24. Based on the data provided,are there any <br /> additional QC issues? <br /> 25. Do the data tables match die hardcopy report? <br /> J U3P-ARC01Chenvstry\Checklists and TernplateslDQ1 Checklist Generic-Air.Aoueous Snil rinr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.