Laserfiche WebLink
were slightly lower than in the shallow wells (e.g., the well pair, MW -4R -S and MW -4R -D). <br />This is an expected result of groundwater flow away from the Port of Stockton. <br />' The Port of Stockton is located to the north and west of the site and local groundwater is inferred <br />to flow eastward from the port. Quarterly groundwater monitoring events have noted <br />groundwater flow direction varying from northwest to northeast to east at an average gradient of <br />0.002 feet per feet. Slug tests were performed on wells MW-4RS and MW-4RD in May 2006. <br />The resultant hydraulic conductivity for MW-4RS, screened from 35 to 50 feet bgs, was <br />calculated to be 57 feet/day. The hydraulic conductivity at MW-4RD, screened from 75 to 80 <br />1 feet bgs, was calculated to be 194 feet/day (Shaw, 2006b). <br />2.3 Investigation History <br />An environmental investigation of the site was initiated following the removal of the 550 -gallon <br />UST in 1996. Soil samples collected from beneath the excavation indicated the presence of <br />' residual hydrocarbons. Subsequent site characterization was conducted over a period of several <br />years and results indicated the presence of residual hydrocarbons in both the vadose zone and <br />groundwater. Petroleum hydrocarbons were found to depths of at least 60 feet bgs, or <br />' approximately 40 feet beneath the water table (Shaw, 2006a). <br />Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) was conducted at the site from February 2000 until October 2004 to <br />address the petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in the soil within the vadose zone. Over <br />several years, SVE treatment operations resulted in the removal of approximately 3,244 pounds <br />of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) and 4.9 pounds of benzene from the soil <br />(CVRWQCB, 2007a). <br />In March 2006, Shaw performed a round of soil and groundwater sampling to assess the lateral <br />and vertical distributions of residual hydrocarbons and evaluate conditions for potential <br />treatment of the hydrocarbons within the saturated zone (Shaw 2006a). During the investigation, <br />nine direct -push soil borings (MIP -1, -la, -lb, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, and -7) were advanced, and the <br />level of hydrocarbon contamination was screened using a real-time Membrane Interface Probe <br />(MIP). The MIP investigation showed locally high hydrocarbon responses at select locations <br />from 25 feet bgs down through 61 feet bgs, and approaching non -detect at 65 feet bgs. The <br />' maximum achievable direct -push depth was 65 feet bgs. Soil samples were also collected from <br />direct -push soil borings (DP -4, -6, -8, and -9) for laboratory analyses during the March 2006 <br />' investigation. Soil benzene results ranged from non -detect to 5,500 micrograms per kilogram <br />(µg/kg). Hydrocarbon contamination was generally noted from depths of 35 feet to 62 feet bgs <br />and localized in locations at DP -4 and DP -9 (Shaw 2006a). <br />I <br />IFS_OnsdePetroleum Hydrocarbon Remediadon.doc 2-3 Shaw Environmental, Inc. <br />