Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 <br />An iridescent fuel sheen was observed at two intervals within DP -9: (1) from 47.5 to 48 feet bgs, <br />and (2) from 52.5 to approximately 54 feet bgs. The fuel sheen suggests the potential presence <br />of separate -phase hydrocarbons. <br />A Third Quarter 2007 groundwater monitoring event was conducted in September 2007. In <br />addition to water level measurement, groundwater samples were collected from nine wells on <br />and off site. These wells are MW -1R, MW -2R, MW -3R, MW-4RS, MW-4RD, VW -11), <br />VW -21), VW -31), and VW -4. The furthest offsite well is MW -3R and is located upgradient of <br />the site. Sampling results were presented in the quarterly monitoring report submitted to <br />CVRWQCB in October 2007 (Shaw, 2007). <br />Historical site investigation information also suggests the presence of residual and dissolved <br />phase hydrocarbons in the groundwater beneath the facilities on the other three corners of the <br />intersection of Lincoln and West Charter Way (Shaw 2006a). As of September 2007, no active <br />groundwater remediation is known to have been occurring at those facilities. <br />2.4 Nature and Extent of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contamination <br />Historical investigation results confirm that the soil and groundwater in the saturated zone at the <br />site has been impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons, including benzene, ethyl benzene, toluene, <br />and xylenes (alternatively referred to as BTEX). The bulk of the contamination appears to be <br />within the former UST location near the east end of the property, with elevated TPH-g and <br />BTEX concentrations found at VW -11), VW -21), VW -31), and MW-4RS. Based on the Third <br />Quarter 2007 sampling results, the highest TPH-g concentration was reported at 85,000 <br />micrograms per liter (µg/L), while the highest benzene concentration was reported at 4,900 gg/L. <br />Both were found at VW -21), right in the former UST location (Shaw 2007). TPH and BTEX <br />contamination levels decline away from the former UST location, with no detections at MW -1R, <br />MW -2R, MW -3R, and VW -4. Figure 4 shows the distribution of TPH-g and BTEX in the <br />groundwater across the site and the approximate lateral extent of the groundwater plume for <br />treatment. <br />' Most of the hydrocarbon contamination also appears to be within 25 and 60 feet bgs (see <br />Figure 3). Although TPH-g and BTEX were detected as deep as 80 feet bgs at MW-4RD, the <br />concentrations were substantially low compared to those found shallower than 60 feet bgs. The <br />notable concentration difference supports the belief that the vertical migration of the <br />hydrocarbon to below 60 feet bgs is limited due in part to the underlying presence of a more <br />confining layer of silt and clay soils (Figure 3). A work plan has been prepared separately to <br />further verify the vertical extent of the hydrocarbon contamination in the saturated zone at the <br />' site. Findings from the delineation activity will be incorporated in the final design of the <br />treatment system. <br />FS Onsite Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation.doc 2-4 Shaw Environmental, Inc. <br />