Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> I <br /> PUBLIC IntEALTH SERViNZES <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ? a <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION [ ` <br /> Karen Furst, M.D., M.P.H., Health Officer <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor • Stockton, CA 95202 9 ' F ° tea <br /> 209/468-3420 <br /> ROGER LISTON NOV 2 51997 <br /> DARPETROINC <br /> 3450 EL CAMINO AVE <br /> CERES CA 95307 <br /> RE: Darpetro Exxon SITE CODE: 1060 <br /> 749 E Charter Way <br /> Stockton CA 95206 - <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) has reviewed the <br /> November 10, 1997 Quarterly Report prepared by California Geophysical Group for the above referenced <br /> site. <br /> Monitoring wells 1 , 2 and 3 have not been tested for the presence of oxygenates. The PHS/EHD letter <br /> dated September 25 , 1997, states that all monitoring wells should be monitored for oxygenates by method <br /> 8260. The water samples from these wells, beginning with the January monitoring event, should be <br /> analyzed for oxygenates, gasoline, benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylenes. A copy of the <br /> September 25, 1997, PHS/EHD letter has been enclosed for your review. <br /> Oxygenates were detected in monitoring wells 5,6, 7, 8 and 9. The MTBE detection in monitoring well 5 was <br /> not tabulated in Table 3 "Summary of Groundwater Analyses" or in Table 3B "Summary of Groundwater <br /> Analyses (oxygenates)" . Please tabulate this data appropriately. <br /> ORC compound has been placed in several wells in lieu of air sparging to aid in the vapor extraction <br /> process. Oxygen readings from 8 of the 11 wells have been included in the report, Table 3A does not <br /> indicate which wells contain the ORC compound and which wells are being monitored for oxygen <br /> dispersal from the ORC wells. PHS/EHD recommends that the table be revised to include this data. <br />'r In order to reduce the probability of cross contamination of wells and samples and to aid in the <br />'r decontamination process, wells are sampled in the customary sequence of lowest concentration to highest <br /> concentration, Based on data obtained in July of 1997 , the sample order for October should have been <br /> 11 416, 10, 9,7, 8, 5. In October the sample order was 11 1416110171 %815, <br /> The presence of 1 ppb benzene, 2 ppb toluene, .4 ppb ethyl benzene and . 5 ppb xylenes in the tubing <br /> blank taken on October 21 , 1997 indicates that decontamination procedures were inadequate. The pump <br /> blank taken on July 21 , 1997 tested positive for 52 ppb benzene, 266 ppb toluene, 79 ppb ethyl benzene, <br /> 367 ppb xylenes and 1730 ppb gasoline. The tubing blank taken on April 24, 1997 tested positive for 161 <br /> ppb benzene, 418 ppb toluene, 78 ppb ethyl benzene, 306 ppb xylenes and 2180 ppb gasoline, <br /> Equipment blanks were not taken prior to April 1997. <br /> With this quantity of contamination remaining on equipment after decontamination, cross contamination of <br /> samples may be occurring and the accuracy of the analytical results may be compromised . Although the <br /> equipment blank for October indicates lower concentrations of contaminants, PHS/EHD recommends that <br /> you run equipment blanks for every sample taken until the reliance of your decontamination procedure <br /> can be re-established. <br /> A Division of San Joaquin County Health Care Services <br />