Laserfiche WebLink
i Nomellini Property December 2013 <br /> 1045 West Charter Way, Stockton <br /> Claim No: 552 <br /> Rationale for Closure under the Policy <br /> • General Criteria : The case meets all eight Policy general criteria . <br /> • Groundwater Specific Criteria : The case does not meet the Policy criteria because the extent <br /> of groundwater contamination is not defined-and dissolved concentration of benzene is <br /> greater than 1 , 000 micrograms per liter (Ng/L). <br /> • Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air: This case does not meet the vapor intrusion criteria of the Policy <br /> because the maximum benzene concentration in groundwater is greater than 1 , 000 lag/L, while <br /> the minimum depth to groundwater is less than 30 feet. <br /> • Direct Contact and Outdoor Air Exposure: The case meets Policy Criterion 3a. Maximum <br /> concentrations in soil are less than those in Policy Table 1 for Commercial use and the <br /> concentration limits for a Utility Worker are not exceeded . There are no soil sample results in <br /> the case record for naphthalene. However, the relative concentration of naphthalene in soil <br /> can be conservatively estimated using the published relative concentrations of naphthalene <br /> and benzene in gasoline. Taken from Potter and Simmons ( 1998) , gasoline mixtures contain <br /> approximately 2 percent benzene and 0 . 25 percent naphthalene. Therefore , benzene can be <br /> directly substituted for naphthalene concentrations with a safety factor of eight. Benzene <br /> concentrations from the Site are below the naphthalene thresholds in Policy Table 1 . <br /> Therefore , the estimated naphthalene concentrations meet the thresholds in Table 1 and the <br /> Policy criteria for direct contact by a factor of eight. It is highly unlikely that naphthalene <br /> concentrations in the soil, if any, exceed the threshold . <br /> Objections to Closure and Responses <br /> According to the Path to Closure page in GeoTracker, the County opposes closure because: <br /> • Secondary source remains. <br /> RESPONSE: Secondary source as defined by the Policy was removed by excavation in <br /> 1988. <br /> • The case does not meet Policy indoor vapor criteria. <br /> RESPONSE : We concur, based on existing data . <br /> Recommendation <br /> The current groundwater quality is unknown. The Fund recommends that the County direct that <br /> Responsible Party to conduct a complete round of groundwater monitoring including all monitoring <br /> and remediation wells to establish current groundwater conditions. <br /> Ramesh Sundareswaran Date Robert Trommer, C. H . G . Date <br /> Water Resource Control Engineer Senior Engineering Geologist <br /> Technical Review Unit Chief, Technical Review Unit <br /> (916) 341 -5670 (916) 341 -5684 <br /> Page 2 of 14 <br />