Laserfiche WebLink
' 1 <br />I <br />t ' ` Y <br />1 <br />I , <br />19 July 2004 <br />AGE -NC Project No 95-0121 ' <br />' t Page 7 of 9 , <br />� r <br />, I I <br />'} Various BTEX` compounds were detected from the above seven "grab' water samples at <br />concentrations as high as 2,800 µg/1 benzene (CPT -3), 150 µg/1 toluene (CPT -2), 510 µg/1 <br />ethylbenzene (CPT -3), and 220 gg/1 total xylenes (CPT -2) The greatest benzene concentration <br />detected was from CPT -3 at a concentration of 2,800 µg/1(See Figure 5)^ <br />i <br />MTBE was not detected above laboratory reporting limits in any of the ground water samples <br />' analyzed <br />I <br />1,2 -DCA was detected in six `grab' water samples collected from CPT -1(96-99 feet), CPT -2 (47-50 t <br />' feet, 65-68 feet, 79-82 feet and 95 to 98 feet) and CPT -3 (50-53 feet) at concentrations as high as 250 r - <br />µg/1(CPT-2/47-50 feet) <br />' TAME was detected in three `grab' water samples collected from CPT -1(96-99 feet), CPT -2 (79-82 <br />feet) and CPT -3 (50-53 feet) at concentrations as high as 49 µg/1(CPT-3/50-53 feet) i <br />' DIPE was detected in one `grab' water sample collected from CPT -2 (65-68 feet) at a concentration d , <br />of 8 3 gg/1 <br />I• No other petroleum hydrocarbon constituents or fuel oxygenated compounds were detected by <br />laboratory analysis The laboratory report (CTEL Project Number CT214-0402032) and chain -of - <br />custody forms are presented in Appendix C GeoTracker confirmation pages of the submitted <br />laboratory electronic deliverable format (EDF) files are included in Appendix D <br />j.0.' SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br />r <br />S <br />' The implications of the February 2004 CPT investigation results are as follows <br />• Although soil distribution may locally vary, AGE interpreted the CPT data collected from <br />I CPT -1 through CPT -4 to represent the typical soil types beneath the site, cross section A -A' <br />was constructed and depicts the general lithology beneath the site (Figure 3) <br />• AGE interpreted the CPT'data to identify Itwo potential hydrogeologic flow units informally' <br />identified as HU2-First Flow Unit (located between 25 and 32 feet), and HU4-Second Flow <br />Unit (located between 40 and 53 feet) Generally, permeable to semi -permeable lithology was { <br />observed in HU2 and in HU4 that consisted of fine to medium sand and silty fine sand to �1 <br />sandy silt <br />• AGE interpreted the CPT data to identify three semi-confining/confining units informally' <br />Iidentified as HU1 (located between 18 and 25 feet), HU3 (located between 32 and 40 feet) <br />. . and HU5 (located between 53 and 100 feet) Generally, less -permeable lithology was <br />observed from HU1, HU3 and HU5 that consisted of fine grained, silty clay and clayey silt <br />Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc <br />II I 4 <br />j I <br />